|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910782943303321 |
|
|
Autore |
Grier Michelle <1960-> |
|
|
Titolo |
Kant's doctrine of transcendental illusion / / Michelle Grier [[electronic resource]] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Cambridge : , : Cambridge University Press, , 2001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-107-11881-6 |
1-280-42107-X |
0-511-17441-1 |
0-511-01808-8 |
0-511-15435-6 |
0-511-30228-2 |
0-511-49814-4 |
0-511-04918-8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (xiii, 315 pages) : digital, PDF file(s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Modern European philosophy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Illusion (Philosophy) - History - 18th century |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references (p. 307-311) and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
; pt. 1. Kant's Discovery of Metaphysical Illusion. ; 1. Metaphysical Error in the Precritical Works. ; 2. The Inaugural Dissertation -- ; pt. 2. Fallacies and Illusions in the Critique of Pure Reason. ; 3. The Transcendental Employment of the Understanding and the Conflation of Appearances and Things in Themselves. ; 4. Transcendental Illusion -- ; pt. 3. The Dialectical Inferences of Pure Reason. ; 5. Rational Psychology and the Pseudorational Idea of the Soul. ; 6. Rational Cosmology and the Pseudoempirical Idea of the World. ; 7. Rational Theology and the Pseudorational Idea of God -- ; pt. 4. Illusion and Systematicity. ; 8. The Regulative Employment of Reason. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
This major study of Kant provides a detailed examination of the development and function of the doctrine of transcendental illusion in his theoretical philosophy. The author shows that a theory of 'illusion' plays a central role in Kant's arguments about metaphysical speculation and scientific theory. Indeed, she argues that we cannot understand Kant unless we take seriously his claim that the mind inevitably acts in |
|
|
|
|