|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910782533603321 |
|
|
Autore |
Haney David Paul <1963-> |
|
|
Titolo |
The Americanization of social science [[electronic resource] ] : intellectuals and public responsibility in the postwar United States / / David Paul Haney |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Philadelphia, : Temple University Press, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-282-04741-8 |
1-59213-715-6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (297 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Sociology - Study and teaching - United States |
Sociology - United States - History - 20th century |
Sociologists - United States |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references (p. [253]-275) and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Introduction -- The postwar campaign for scientific legitimacy -- Quantitative methods and the institutionalization of exclusivity -- Social theory and the romance of American alienation -- Theories of mass society and the advent of a new elitism -- Fads, foibles, and autopsies: unwelcome publicity for diffident sociologists -- Pseudoscience and social engineering: American sociology's public image in the fifties -- The perils of popularity: public sociology and its antagonists -- Conclusion: the legacy of the scientific identity. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
In this, a unique history of the America's postwar intellectual, David Paul Haney outlines the development of sociology as a discipline and why, given its focus of study, it failed to develop into a force in the intellectual currents of the United States. Arguing that sociologists attempted to develop both a science and an instrument for the spread of humanistic concern about society, Haney shows how both attempts failed to connect sociology with larger questions of policy and social progress. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|