|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910782261703321 |
|
|
Autore |
Min Kyung-Jin |
|
|
Titolo |
The Levitical authorship of Ezra-Nehemiah [[electronic resource] /] / Kyung-jin Min |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
London ; ; New York, : T & T Clark International, c2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-281-80271-9 |
9786611802714 |
0-567-63272-5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (192 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Journal for the study of the Old Testament. Supplement series ; ; 409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and indexes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Contents; Abbreviations; INTRODUCTION; Part I: PRIESTLY OR LEVITICAL AUTHORSHIP?; Chapter 1 EZRA-NEHEMIAH AS AN INDEPENDENT SINGLE WORK; Chapter 2 PRIESTLY OR LEVITICAL AUTHORSHIP?; Summary of Part I; Part II: LITERARY CONTEXT; Chapter 3 LEVITES IN OLD TESTAMENT TEXTS SINCE THE EXILE; Chapter 4 LEVITES IN EZRA-NEHEMIAH; Summary of Part II; Part III: HISTORICAL CONTEXT; Chapter 5 Two CLUES; Chapter 6 LEVITICAL AUTHORSHIP; Summary of Part III; CONCLUSION; Bibliography; Index of References; Index of Authors; A; B; C; D; E; F; G; H; I; J; K; L; M; N; O; P; R; S; T; U; V; W; Y; Z |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
The study of Ezra-Nehemiah has been revolutionized in recent years by a growing rejection of the long-established belief that it was composed as part of the Chronicler's work. That shift in scholarly paradigms has re-opened many questions of origin and purpose, and this thesis attempts to establish an answer to the most important of these: the question of authorship. Here, Kyungjin Min argues that Ezra-Nehemiah most likely originated in a Levitical group that received Persian backing during the late-fifth century BCE and that valued the ideologies of decentralization of power, unity and cooper |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|