|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910781840303321 |
|
|
Autore |
Miller D. Gary |
|
|
Titolo |
Complex verb formation [[electronic resource] /] / D. Gary Miller |
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Amsterdam ; ; Philadelphia, : J. Benjamins, 1993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-283-31298-0 |
9786613312983 |
90-272-7699-4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (401 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Amsterdam studies in the theory and history of linguistic science. Series IV, Current issues in linguistic theory, , 0304-0763 ; ; v. 95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Grammar, Comparative and general - Verb |
Grammar, Comparative and general - Word formation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references (p. [327]-369) and indexes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
COMPLEX VERB FORMATION; Editorial page; Title page; Copyright page; Acknowledgements; ABBREVIATIONS; Table of contents; PREFACE; 1. GENERAL ASSUMPTIONS ABOUT MORPHOLOGY; 2. THEORIES OF VERBAL MORPHEME ORDER; 3. PRINCIPLES AND PARAMETERS IN MORPHOLOGY; 4 THE FP HYPOTHESIS, COMPOUNDING, AND INCORPORATION; 5. PREPOSITION INCORPORATION; 6. GRAMMATICAL FUNCTION CHANGING PROCESSES; 7. PASSIVE, MIDDLE, AND ERGATIVE; 8. REFLEXIVE AND RECIPROCAL VERBS; 9. REFLEXIVE INCORPORATION AND ITS DISAPPEARANCE IN SCANDINAVIAN; 10. ON THE NOTION 'PASSIVE MORPHOLOGY'; 11. CAUSATIVE VERB FORMATION |
12. COMPLEXINTERACTIONSREFERENCES; LANGUAGE INDEX; SUBJECT INDEX |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
This investigation of complex verb formation seeks to identify and clarify the way(s) in which a base verb becomes 'complex'. The author carefully considers both the syntactic and the morphological side of this question, and in doing so brings a wealth of data from very diverse languages to bear on claims made about the relationship between syntactic and morphological structure. The work takes the radical position that most data admit of either a syntactic (Phrase Structure) or lexical analysis because both are likely to be valid - under different |
|
|
|
|