|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910781657203321 |
|
|
Autore |
Anagnostopoulou Elena |
|
|
Titolo |
Materials on Left Dislocation [[electronic resource]] |
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Amsterdam/Philadelphia, : John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-283-23424-6 |
9786613234247 |
90-272-8236-6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (357 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Altri autori (Persone) |
|
RiemsdijkHenk van |
ZwartsFrans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Generative grammar |
Grammar, Comparative and general -- Syntax |
Grammar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Preface; CONTENTS; LEFT DISLOCATION; Part I: Basic Texts; Left Dislocation in Dutch and Status of Copying Rules; On Left Dislocation; On the Source of Lefthand NPs in French; Left Dislocation, Connectedness and Reconstruction; 'Topic' Constructions in some European Languages and 'Connectedness'; Contrastive Dislocation in Dutch an Icelandic; Part II: Current Developments; Clitic Left Dislocation and Contrastive Left Dislocation; Dislocation, Resumption and Weakest Crossover; Clitic Left Dislocation and other Relatives; Left Dislocation and Split Topics in Bahant Dutch |
Parasitic Operators in German Left-DislocationIndex |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
Materials on Left Dislocation consists of two parts. Part I contains a selection of the main texts on which our present understanding of the Left Dislocation construction is based. For various reasons most of these texts had never been published, or are published in obsolete places. These articles, by Van Riemsdijk & Zwarts, Rodman, Hirschbuehler, Vat, Cinque and Zaenen, contain the first arguments that pertain to the major questions about Left Dislocation (for example whether movement or base-generation is involved), and they present the rationale for the now standard distinctions betw |
|
|
|
|