|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910781653103321 |
|
|
Autore |
Nair Neeti <1978-> |
|
|
Titolo |
Changing homelands [[electronic resource] ] : Hindu politics and the partition of India / / Neeti Nair |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Cambridge, MA, : Harvard University Press, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (356 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Hindus - India - Punjab - Politics and government - 20th century |
Identity (Psychology) - India - Punjab - History - 20th century |
Nationalism - India - Punjab - History - 20th century |
Religion and politics - India - Punjab - History - 20th century |
Religious minorities - India - Punjab - History - 20th century |
Muslims - India - Punjab - History - 20th century |
Sikhs - India - Punjab - History - 20th century |
Punjab (India) Politics and government 20th century |
India History Partition, 1947 Influence |
Punjab (India) Ethnic relations History 20th century |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Frontmatter -- CONTENTS -- Abbreviations -- Introduction -- 1. Loyalty and Anti- Colonial Nationalism -- 2. Negotiating a Minority Status -- 3. Religion and Non- Violence in Punjabi Politics -- 4. Towards an All- India Settlement -- 5. Partition Violence and the Question of Responsibility -- 6. Memory and the Search for Meaning in Post- Partition Delhi -- Conclusion -- Acknowledgments -- Notes -- Glossary -- Selected Bibliography -- Index |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
Changing Homelands offers a startling new perspective on what was and was not politically possible in late colonial India. In this highly readable account of the partition in the Punjab, Neeti Nair rejects the idea that essential differences between the Hindu and Muslim communities made political settlement impossible. Far from being an inevitable solution, the idea of partition was a very late, stunning |
|
|
|
|