|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910781480703321 |
|
|
Autore |
Luong Hy V |
|
|
Titolo |
Discursive practices and linguistic meanings : the Vietnamese system of person reference / / Hy V. Luong |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Amsterdam ; ; Philadelphia : , : J. Benjamins Pub. Co., , 1990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-283-17429-4 |
9786613174291 |
90-272-8335-4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (223 pages) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Pragmatics & beyond ; ; new ser. 11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Vietnamese language - Usage |
Vietnamese language - Address, Forms of |
Vietnamese language - Noun |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
DISCURSIVE PRACTICES AND LINGUISTIC MEANINGS THE VIETNAMESE SYSTEM OF PERSON REFERENCE; Editorial page; Title page; Copyright page; Table of contents; Dedication; Acknowledgements; 1. REPRESENTATION, CHOICE, AND LANGUAGE: AN INTRODUCTION; 2. ""BROTHER"" AND ""UNCLE"": NATIVE MODELS AND THE MEANINGS OF VIETNAMESE KINSHIP TERMS; 3. VIETNAMESE PROPER NOUNS: STRUCTURE, PRACTICE, AND POLITICS; 4. PERSONAL PRONOUNS; 5. NATIVE MODELS, STRUCTURAL OPPOSITIONS, AND DISCURSIVE PRACTICES; APPENDIX 1: GENEALOGICAL REFERENTS AND REFERENTIAL PERSPECTIVES IN VIETNAMESE KIN TERM USAGES |
APPENDIX 2: EQUIVALENCE RULES FOR THE GENEALOGICAL EXTENSION OF VIETNAMESE KIN TERMINOLOGY; APPENDIX 3: LOGICAL RELATIONS AND RULES OF LINGUISTIC USAGES; APPENDIX 4: STATUS TERMS IN THE NGUYÊN-PHÚC PATRILINE; NOTES; REFERENCES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
This is a theoretically oriented study of the pragmatics of Vietnamese person reference (kinship terms, personal pronouns, naming set and status terms). Drawing upon linguistic data from a radically different non-Western society and the seminal insights of Volosinov, Bakhtin, and Leach, it offers a critical analysis of the major theoretical premises |
|
|
|
|