| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910453562003321 |
|
|
Titolo |
The logic of organizational disorder / / edited by Massimo Warglien and Michael Masuch |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Berlin ; ; New York : , : W. de Gruyter, , 1996 |
|
©1995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[Reprint 2013] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (214 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
de Gruyter Studies in Organization ; ; 66 |
De Gruyter studies in organization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Altri autori (Persone) |
|
WarglienMassimo |
MasuchMichael <1949-> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Organizational behavior |
Garbage can models of decision making |
Electronic books. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Frontmatter -- Contents -- The logic of organizational disorder: an introduction / Warglien, Massimo / Masuch, Michael -- Sifting the garbage: conceptualizing and explaining processes of strategic decision making / Hickson, David J. / Butler, Richard J. / Cray, David / Mallory, Geoffrey / Wilson, David C. -- Organized anarchies: a reconsideration of research strategies / Musselin, Christine -- The diffusion of innovation in the judicial system / Ackermann, Werner / Bastard, Benoit -- Ideology and loose couplings in management control systems / Bernardi, Bruno -- The relativization of formal organization / Friedberg, Erhard -- Managing organizational disorder / Brunsson, Nils -- The disorder of organizational logic - makework among members of bureaucratic organizations / Masuch, Michael / LaPotin, Perry -- Learning in a garbage can situation: a network model / Warglien, Massimo -- Organizational learning of routines: a model from the garbage can family / Cohen, Michael D. -- Bounded rationality, hyper-rationalization and the use of social science knowledge / Crozier, Michel -- Ambiguity, endogeneity, and intelligence / March, James G. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910780082003321 |
|
|
Autore |
Walker J. Samuel |
|
|
Titolo |
Permissible dose : a history of radiation protection in the twentieth century / / J. Samuel Walker |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Berkeley, CA : , : University of California Press, , [2000] |
|
©2001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
9786612356292 |
1-282-35629-1 |
0-520-92484-3 |
1-59734-804-X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (183 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Classificazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Nuclear energy - Law and legislation - United States - History |
Radiation - Safety measures - History |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Front matter -- Contents -- Figures -- Preface -- I. The Discovery of Radiation and Its Hazards -- 2. The Debate over Nuclear Power and Radiation -- 3. The Role of Federal Agencies in Radiation Protection -- 4. New Controversies, New Standards -- 5. The Ambiguities of Radiation Effects -- Essay on Sources -- Index |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
How much radiation is too much? J. Samuel Walker examines the evolution, over more than a hundred years, of radiation protection standards and efforts to ensure radiation safety for nuclear workers and for the general public. The risks of radiation-caused by fallout from nuclear bomb testing, exposure from medical or manufacturing procedures, effluents from nuclear power, or radioactivity from other sources-have aroused more sustained controversy and public fear than any other comparable industrial or environmental hazard. Walker clarifies the entire radiation debate, showing that permissible dose levels are a key to the principles and practices that have prevailed in the field of radiation protection since the 1930's, and to their highly charged political and scientific history as well. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |