| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910214919603321 |
|
|
Autore |
Belsey Catherine |
|
|
Titolo |
Usure et rupture - Breaking points / / Claudine Raynaud, Peter Vernon |
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Tours, : Presses universitaires François-Rabelais, 2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (230 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Altri autori (Persone) |
|
BesnaultAnne |
BoldriniLucia |
DelechelleGérard |
Di MascioPatrick |
GirardGeneviève |
JulienClaude |
LagayettePierre |
LapaireJean-Rémi |
MilesiLaurent |
PierJohn |
PugheTom |
RaynaudClaudine |
RiouDaniel |
Santin-GuettierAnne-Marie |
TuttleElizabeth |
VernonPeter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Literature (General) |
usure |
rupture |
littérature |
linguistique |
linguistics |
literature |
erosion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
Certain recurrent ideas emerge through the rich diversity of papers collected here under the title Usure et Rupture: the necessity of cultural memory in finding an idiom, the rupture of form to provide a new text which makes sense of the past from the viewpoint of the present, the ways in which the image of usury plays an ambiguous role-both fructifying and economizing the text. A translator's delight, rupture in English can be variously rendered by break up, breaking up, parting, severance, split, rupture, clash, antagonism, discrepancy, gap, disjunction, disruption, discontinuity, reversal, change, etc., which should alert us to the treacherously shifting epistemological grounds onto which we dared to tread. Usure, this gradual process of wearing out, can also become usury: i. e. "excessive interest". |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910780080303321 |
|
|
Autore |
Ando Clifford <1969-> |
|
|
Titolo |
Imperial ideology and provincial loyalty in the Roman empire / / Clifford Ando |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Berkeley, : University of California Press, c2000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
0-520-92372-3 |
1-59734-672-1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (xxi, 494 pages) : illustrations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Classics and contemporary thought ; ; 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Allegiance - Rome |
Political stability - Rome |
Roman provinces - Administration |
Rome History Empire, 30 B.C.-476 A.D Influence |
Rome Cultural policy Influence |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references (p. 413-449) and indexes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Front matter -- CONTENTS -- List of Illustrations -- Preface and Acknowledgments -- Abbreviations -- 1. Introduction: Communis Patria -- 2. Ideology in the Roman Empire -- 3. The Roman Achievement in Ancient Thought -- 4. The Communicative Actions of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the Roman Government -- 5. Consensus in Theory and Practice -- 6. The Creation of Consensus -- 7. Images of Emperor and Empire -- 8. Orbis Terrarum and Orbis Romanus -- 9. The King Is a Body Politick . . . for that a Body Politique Never Dieth -- 10. Conclusion: Singulare et Unicum Imperium -- Works Cited -- General Index -- Index Locorum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
The Roman empire remains unique. Although Rome claimed to rule the world, it did not. Rather, its uniqueness stems from the culture it created and the loyalty it inspired across an area that stretched from the Tyne to the Euphrates. Moreover, the empire created this culture with a bureaucracy smaller than that of a typical late-twentieth-century research university. In approaching this problem, Clifford Ando does not ask the ever-fashionable question, Why did the Roman empire fall? Rather, he asks, Why did the empire last so long? Imperial Ideology and Provincial Loyalty in the Roman Empire argues that the longevity of the empire rested not on Roman military power but on a gradually realized consensus that Roman rule was justified. This consensus was itself the product of a complex conversation between the central government and its far-flung peripheries. Ando investigates the mechanisms that sustained this conversation, explores its contribution to the legitimation of Roman power, and reveals as its product the provincial absorption of the forms and content of Roman political and legal discourse. Throughout, his sophisticated and subtle reading is informed by current thinking on social formation by theorists such as Max Weber, Jürgen Habermas, and Pierre Bourdieu. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |