| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910780028303321 |
|
|
Autore |
Calvin Jean <1509-1564.> |
|
|
Titolo |
A reformation debate [[electronic resource] ] : Sadoleto's letter to the Genevans and Calvin's reply / / John Calvin & Jacopo Sadoleto ; edited with an introduction, by John C. Olin ; with an appendix on the Justification Controversy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
New York, : Fordham University Press, 2000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
0-8232-3657-9 |
0-8232-4713-9 |
1-282-69856-7 |
9786612698569 |
0-8232-3966-7 |
0-8232-1992-5 |
0-585-41669-9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (141 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Altri autori (Persone) |
|
SadoletoJacopo <1477-1547.> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Church - Authority |
Justification (Christian theology) |
Reformation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Originally published: New York : Harper & Row, 1966. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Front matter -- Contents -- Preface -- Introduction -- Sadoleto's Letter to the Genevans -- Calvin's Reply to Sadoleto -- Appendix: I Calvin on Justification -- Appendix II The Council of Trent on Justification |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
In 1539, Cardinal Jacopo Sadoleto, Bishop of Carpentras, addressed a letter to the magistrates and citizens of Geneva, asking them to return to the Roman Catholic faith. John Calvin replied to Sadoleto, defending the adoption of the Protestant reforms. Sadoleto’s letter and Calvin’s reply constitute one of the most interesting exchanges of Roman Catholic/Protestant views during the Reformation and an excellent introduction to the great religious controversy of the sixteenth century. These statements are not in vacuo of a Roman Catholic and Protestant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
position. They were drafted in the midst of the religious conflict that was then dividing Europe. And they reflect too the temperaments and personal histories of the men who wrote them. Sadoleto’s letter has an irenic approach, an emphasis on the unity and peace of the Church, highly characteristic of the Christian Humanism he represented. Calvin’s reply is in part a personal defense, an apologia pro vita sua, that records his own religious experience. And its taut, comprehensive argument is characteristic of the disciplined and logical mind of the author of The Institutes of the Christian Religion. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910438237603321 |
|
|
Titolo |
Comparative issues in the governance of research biobanks : property, privacy, intellectual property, and the role of technology / / Giovanni Pascuzzi, Umberto Izzo, Matteo Macilotti, editors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Heidelberg ; ; New York, : Springer, 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-299-33670-1 |
3-642-33116-5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[1st ed. 2013.] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (332 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Altri autori (Persone) |
|
PascuzziGiovanni |
IzzoUmberto |
MacilottiMatteo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Biobanks - Law and legislation |
Biology - Research - Law and legislation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
From the contents: Property and Privacy in Biobanking -- Intellectual Property and Biobanks -- Biobanks: The Perspective of Biobanker's. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
In the last few years, the boom in biobanking has prompted a lively debate on a host of interrelated legal issues, such as the Gordian knot of the ownership of biological materials, as well as privacy concerns. The latter are due to the difficulty of accepting that biological samples must be completely anonymous without making it practically |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
impossible to exploit their information potential. The issues also include the delicate role and the changing content of the donor’s “informed consent” as the main legal tool that may serve to link the privacy and property interests of donors with the research interests and the set of principles that should be at the core of the biobanking practice. Lastly, the IP issues and the patentability of biological samples as well as the protection of databases storing genetic information obtained from the samples are covered. Collecting eighteen essays written by eminent scholars from Italy, the US, the UK and Canada, this book provides new solutions to these problems. From a comparative viewpoint, it explores the extent to which digital technology may assist in tackling the numerous regulatory issues raised by the practice of biobanking for research purposes. These issues may be considered and analyzed under the traditional paradigms of Property, Privacy, Informed Consent and Intellectual Property. |
|
|
|
|
|
| |