1.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910779753503321

Autore

Collins Ronald K. L.

Titolo

On dissent : its meaning in America / / Ronald K.L. Collins & David M. Skover [[electronic resource]]

Pubbl/distr/stampa

Cambridge : , : Cambridge University Press, , 2013

ISBN

1-107-06476-7

1-139-88796-3

1-107-50268-3

1-107-05427-3

1-107-05873-2

1-139-02401-9

1-107-05525-3

1-107-05746-9

1-107-05636-5

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource (xx, 179 pages) : digital, PDF file(s)

Disciplina

322.40973

Soggetti

Government, Resistance to - United States

Dissenting opinions - United States

Judicial opinions - United States

Dissenters - Legal status, laws, etc - United States

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Note generali

Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).

Nota di bibliografia

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Nota di contenuto

Informationis personae -- Prologue -- 1: From judicial dissent to peaceful protest -- 2: From civil to uncivil disobedience -- 3: Vagaries of violence -- 4: Dissent, Inc -- 5: Dissent and law's parameters -- Epilogue -- Notes -- Acknowledgments -- About the authors -- About the Informationis personae -- Select and annotated bibliography -- Index.

Sommario/riassunto

America values dissent. It tolerates, encourages and protects it. But what is this thing we value? That is a question never asked. 'Dissent' is treated as a known fact. For all that has been said about it - in books, articles, judicial opinions, and popular culture - it is remarkable that no one has devoted much, if any, ink to explaining what dissent is. No one



has attempted to sketch its philosophical, linguistic, legal or cultural meanings or usages. There is a need to develop some clarity about this phenomenon, for not every difference of opinion, symbolic gesture, public activity in opposition to government policy, incitement to direct action, revolutionary effort or political assassination need be tagged dissent. In essence, we have no conceptual yardstick. It is just that measure of meaning that On Dissent offers.