| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNISA996390848103316 |
|
|
Autore |
Crowley Robert <1518?-1588.> |
|
|
Titolo |
The confutation of the mishapen aunswer to the misnamed, wicked ballade, called the Abuse of ye blessed sacrame[n]t of the aultare [[electronic resource] ] : Wherin, thou haste (gentele reader) the ryghte vnderstandynge of al the places of scripture that Myles Hoggard, (wyth his learned counsail) hath wrested to make for the transubstanciation of the bread and wyne. Compiled by Robert Crowley. Anno. 1548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
[Imprinted at London, : By Ihon Day and William Seres, dwellyng in Sepulchres parish at the signe of the Resurrectio[n] a little aboue Holbourne Conduite, [1548]] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Altri autori (Persone) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Prints the ballad (first line "Of late a new balad came to my hand"), with an answer by Miles Huggarde in verse and Crowley's confutation in prose. |
Printers' names and address from colophon. |
Signatures: A-E F¹⁰ (-D8). |
Reproduction of the original in the British Library. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910779535103321 |
|
|
Autore |
Kalinovsky Artemy M |
|
|
Titolo |
A long goodbye [[electronic resource] ] : the Soviet withdrawal from Afghanistan / / Artemy M. Kalinovsky |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Cambridge, Mass., : Harvard University Press, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (304 pages) : illustrations, maps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Disengagement (Military science) |
Soviet Union Foreign relations Afghanistan |
Afghanistan Foreign relations Soviet Union |
Afghanistan History Soviet occupation, 1979-1989 |
Soviet Union Foreign relations 1975-1985 |
Soviet Union Foreign relations 1985-1991 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
The reluctant intervention -- The turn toward diplomacy -- Gorbachev confronts Afghanistan -- The national reconciliation campaign -- Engaging with the Americans -- The Army withdraws and the Politburo debates -- Soviet policy adrift. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
The conflict in Afghanistan looms large in the collective consciousness of Americans. What has the United States achieved, and how will it withdraw without sacrificing those gains? The Soviet Union confronted these same questions in the 1980's, and Artemy Kalinovsky's history of the USSR's nine-year struggle to extricate itself from Afghanistan and bring its troops home provides a sobering perspective on exit options in the region. What makes Kalinovsky's intense account both timely and important is its focus not on motives for initiating the conflict but on the factors that prevented the Soviet leadership from ending a demoralizing war. Why did the USSR linger for so long, given that key elites recognized the blunder of the mission shortly after the initial deployment? Newly available archival material, supplemented by interviews with major actors, allows Kalinovsky to reconstruct the fierce debates among Soviet diplomats, KGB officials, the Red Army, and top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Politburo figures. The fear that withdrawal would diminish the USSR's status as leader of the Third World is palpable in these disagreements, as are the competing interests of Afghan factions and the Soviet Union's superpower rival in the West. This book challenges many widely held views about the actual costs of the conflict to the Soviet leadership, and its findings illuminate the Cold War context of a military engagement that went very wrong, for much too long. |
|
|
|
|
|
| |