|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910778869003321 |
|
|
Autore |
Treweek Jo |
|
|
Titolo |
Ecological impact assessment [[electronic resource] /] / Jo Treweek |
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Oxford ; ; Malden, MA, : Blackwell Science, 1999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
9786612186363 |
1-282-18636-1 |
1-4443-1329-0 |
0-632-06128-6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (367 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Ecological assessment (Biology) |
Applied ecology |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references (p. 311-333) and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Ecological impact assessment; Contents; Preface; Acknowledgements; 1: Introduction; 1.1 The EclA process; 1.1.1 Scoping; 1.1.2 Focusing; 1.1.3 Impact prediction; 1.1.4 Evaluation; 1.1.5 Mitigation; 1.1.6 Monitoring; 1.1.7 Geographical information systems; 1.1.8 Survey design and analysis; 1.2 Recommended reading; 2: Legislative contexts for ecological impact assessment; 2.1 Introduction; 2.2 Environmental impact assessment; 2.2.1 The EIA process; 2.2.2 Project-EIA; 2.2.3 Strategic environmental assessment; 2.3 Differences in formal EIA procedures: implications for EclA |
2.3.1 Responsibility for undertaking EIA2.3.2 Eligibility for EIA (indicative thresholds); 2.3.3 Consideration of alternatives; 2.3.4 Public consultation and participation; 2.3.5 Reviewing the EIA process; 2.3.6 Monitoring; 2.3.7 Guidance; 2.4 Legislation for international and trans-boundary effects; 2.4.1 The Convention on Biological Diversity; 2.5 Regulation of industrial activity; 2.5.1 Control of industrial hazards; 2.5.2 Integrated pollution control; 2.6 EclA's role in sustainable development; 2.7 Recommended reading; 3: Scoping; 3.1 Introduction; 3.2 Deriving EclA study limits |
3.3 Characteristics of the proposal3.4 Characteristics of the receiving |
|
|
|
|