1.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910778571803321

Autore

Connolly James J. <1962->

Titolo

The triumph of ethnic Progressivism [[electronic resource] ] : urban political culture in Boston, 1900-1925 / / James J. Connolly

Pubbl/distr/stampa

Cambridge, MA, : Harvard University Press, 1998

ISBN

0-674-02984-4

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource (273 p.)

Disciplina

974.4/61

Soggetti

Political culture - Massachusetts - Boston - History - 20th century

Progressivism (United States politics) - History - 20th century

Boston (Mass.) Politics and government

Boston (Mass.) Ethnic relations

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Note generali

Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph

Nota di bibliografia

Includes bibliographical references (p. [211]-253) and index.

Nota di contenuto

Frontmatter -- Acknowledgments -- Contents -- Tables -- Neighborhoods of Boston - Map -- Introduction -- 1 Politics and Society at the End of the Nineteenth Century -- 2 The Dimensions of Progressivism -- 3 The Politics of Municipal Reform -- 4 The New Urban Political Terrain -- 5 James Michael Curley and the Politics of Ethnic Progressivism -- 6 Ethnic Progressivism Triumphant: Boston Public Life in the 1920s -- Epilogue -- Statistical Appendix -- Selected Primary Sources -- Notes -- Index

Sommario/riassunto

Progressivism, James Connolly shows us, was a language and style of political action available to a wide range of individuals and groups. A diverse array of political and civic figures used it to present themselves as leaders of a communal response to the growing power of illicit interests and to the problems of urban-industrial life. As structural reforms weakened a ward-based party system that helped mute ethnic conflict, this new formula for political mobilization grew more powerful. Its most effective variation in Boston was an "ethnic progressivism" that depicted the city's public life as a clash between its immigrant majority--"the people"--and a wealthy Brahmin elite--"the interests." As this portrayal took hold, Bostonians came to view their city as a community permanently beset by ethnic strife. In showing that



the several reform visions that arose in Boston included not only the progressivism of the city's business leaders but also a series of ethnic progressivisms, Connolly offers a new approach to urban public life in the early twentieth century. He rejects the assumption that ethnic politics was machine politics and employs both institutional and rhetorical analysis to reconstruct the inner workings of neighborhood public life and the social narratives that bound the city together. The result is a deeply textured picture that differs sharply from the traditional view of machine-reform conflict.