|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910778250203321 |
|
|
Titolo |
Review of CCSP draft synthesis and assessment product 5.3 [[electronic resource] ] : decison-support experiments and evaluations using seasonal to interannual forecasts and observational data : panel to review CCSP draft synthesis and assessment product 5.3 : decision-support experiments and evaluations using seasonal to interannual forecasts and observational data / / National Research Council of the National Academies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Washington, D.C., : National Academies Press, c2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
0-309-17859-2 |
1-281-20933-3 |
9786611209339 |
0-309-11569-8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (56 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Climatology - Research - United States - Evaluation |
Climatic changes - Risk assessment |
Atmospheric carbon dioxide - Environmental aspects |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references (p. 40-42). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
""Front matter""; ""CONTENTS""; ""EXECUTIVE SUMMARY""; ""1 INTRODUCTION""; ""2 OVERVIEW ISSUES""; ""3 RESPONSIVENESS TO PROSPECTUS QUESTIONS""; ""4 SUPPORT FOR FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS""; ""5 ORGANIZATION AND ACCESSIBILITY""; ""References""; ""APPENDIX A Topics for Synthesis and Assessment Products of the U.S. Climate Change Science Program""; ""APPENDIX B Biographical Sketches of Panel Members and Staff"" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
This study offered an independent peer review for a synthetic document being produced for the CCSP. It found the draft document to be in a fairly early stage of development and noted several issues needing attention in the revision. The draft was inconsistent across sections with respect to whether or not it accepted two assumptions: that more skillful forecasts necessarily have greater value, and that the |
|
|
|
|