|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910778153803321 |
|
|
Autore |
Müller-Wood Anja <1969-> |
|
|
Titolo |
The theatre of civilized excess [[electronic resource] ] : new perspectives on Jacobean tragedy / / Anja Müller-Wood |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Amsterdam ; ; New York, NY, : Rodopi, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
94-012-0430-6 |
1-4294-8098-X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (224 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Costerus, , 0165-9618 ; ; new ser., v. 169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
English drama (Tragedy) - History and criticism |
English drama - 17th century - History and criticism |
English drama - Early modern and Elizabethan, 1500-1600 - History and criticism |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references (p. 194-217) and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Preliminary Material -- ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS -- INTRODUCTION -- RELOCATING THE STAGE: REFLECTIONS ON EARLYMODERN THEATRE CULTURE -- “ALL THE ILLMAN CAN INVENT”: JOHNWEBSTER AND HIS DUCHESS -- LOOK WHO’S TALKING (PLAINLY): DANGEROUS ELOQUENCE IN THE ATHEIST’S TRAGEDY -- MEMORY, MIMESIS AND THE MATERIAL: CHAPMAN’S SCENE OF WRITING (THE LAW) -- THEATRICAL EXCESS, CRITICAL PRACTICE: WOMEN BEWARE WOMEN AND THE SHAPING OF A BOURGEOIS AESTHETIC -- BIBLIOGRAPHY -- INDEX. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
Jacobean tragedy is typically seen as translating a general dissatisfaction with the first Stuart monarch and his court into acts of calculated recklessness and cynical brutality. Drawing on theoretical influences from social history, psychoanalysis and the study of discourses, this innovative book proposes an alternative perspective: Jacobean tragedy should be seen in the light of the institutional and social concerns of the early modern stage and the ambiguities which they engendered. Although the stage’s professionalization opened up hitherto unknown possibilities of economic success and social advancement for its middle-class practitioners, the imaginative, linguistic and material conditions of their work undermined the very ambitions they generated and furthered. The close reading of play texts |
|
|
|
|