1.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910778109303321

Autore

Colburn Forrest D

Titolo

Varieties of liberalism in Central America : nation-states as works in progress / / Forrest D. Colburn and Arturo Cruz S

Pubbl/distr/stampa

Austin : , : University of Texas Press, , 2007

ISBN

0-292-79480-0

Edizione

[1st ed.]

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource (xv, 115 pages) : illustrations

Altri autori (Persone)

Cruz SArturo J (Cruz Sequeira)

Disciplina

320.5109728

Soggetti

Liberalism - Central America

Central America Politics and government 1979-

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Note generali

Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph

Nota di bibliografia

Includes bibliographical references (p. [111]-115).

Nota di contenuto

Enigmatic nation-states and conceptual nihilism -- Geography and myth -- Liberalism and democracy -- Unfettered markets -- What went right? -- What went wrong? -- Choices, constraints, idiosyncrasies, and fortune.

Sommario/riassunto

Why do some countries progress while others stagnate? Why does adversity strengthen some countries and weaken others? Indeed, in this era of unprecedented movement of people, goods, and ideas, just what constitutes a nation-state? Forrest Colburn and Arturo Cruz suggest how fundamental these questions are through an exploration of the evolution of Guatemala, El Salvador, Honduras, Nicaragua, and Costa Rica over the last quarter of a century, a period of intriguing, often confounding, paradoxes in Central America's development. Offering an elegant defense of empiricism, Colburn and Cruz explore the roles of geography and political choice in constructing nations and states. Countries are shown to be unique: there are a daunting number of variables. There is causality, but not the kind that can be revealed in the laboratory or on the blackboard. Liberalismtoday defined as democracy and unfettered marketsmay be in vogue, but it has no inherent determinants. Democracy and market economies, when welded to the messy realities of individual countries, are compatible with many different outcomes. The world is more pluralistic in both causes and effects than either academic theories or political rhetoric suggest.