| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910777695203321 |
|
|
Autore |
Brode Douglas <1943-> |
|
|
Titolo |
From Walt to Woodstock [[electronic resource] ] : how Disney created the counterculture / / Douglas Brode |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Austin, : University of Texas Press, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[1st ed.] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (287 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Counterculture - United States - History - 20th century |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references (p. 229-238) and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Frontmatter -- Contents -- Acknowledgments -- Introduction. Disney’s Version /Disney’s Vision: The World According to Walt -- 1. Sex, Drugs, and Rock ’n’ Roll: Disney and the Youth Culture -- 2. Little Boxes Made of Ticky-Tacky: Disney and the Culture of Conformity -- 3. The Man Who Says “No”: Disney and the Rebel Hero -- 4. Toward a New Politics: Disney and the Sixties Sensibility -- 5. My Sweet Lord: Romanticism and Religion in Disney -- 6. Gotta Get Back to the Garden: Disney and the Environmental Movement -- 7. “Hell, No! We Won’t Go!” Disney and the Radicalization of Youth -- 8. Providence in the Fall of a Sparrow: Disney and the Denial of Death WHAT A -- Conclusion. Popular Entertainment and Personal Art: Why Should We Take Disney Seriously? -- Notes -- Index |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
With his thumbprint on the most ubiquitous films of childhood, Walt Disney is widely considered to be the most conventional of all major American moviemakers. The adjective "Disneyfied" has become shorthand for a creative work that has abandoned any controversial or substantial content to find commercial success. But does Disney deserve that reputation? Douglas Brode overturns the idea of Disney as a middlebrow filmmaker by detailing how Disney movies played a key role in transforming children of the Eisenhower era into the radical youth of the Age of Aquarius. Using close readings of Disney projects, Brode shows that Disney's films were frequently ahead of their time thematically. Long before the cultural tumult of the sixties, Disney films preached pacifism, introduced a generation to the notion of feminism, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
offered the screen's first drug-trip imagery, encouraged young people to become runaways, insisted on the need for integration, advanced the notion of a sexual revolution, created the concept of multiculturalism, called for a return to nature, nourished the cult of the righteous outlaw, justified violent radicalism in defense of individual rights, argued in favor of communal living, and encouraged antiauthoritarian attitudes. Brode argues that Disney, more than any other influence in popular culture, should be considered the primary creator of the sixties counterculture—a reality that couldn't be further from his "conventional" reputation. |
|
|
|
|
|
| |