| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910773604703321 |
|
|
Autore |
Ege Moritz |
|
|
Titolo |
Urban Ethics : Conflicts Over the Good and Proper Life in Cities / / Moritz Ege and Johannes Moser |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Abingdon, Oxon : , : Routledge, , 2020 |
|
©2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (xi, 320 pages) : illustrations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Routledge studies in urbanism and the city |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Social ethics |
Sociology, Urban |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
This book delves into the ethical dimension of urban life: how should one live in the city? What constitutes a good' life under urban condition? Whose gets to live a good' life, and whose ideas of morality, propriety and good' prevail? What is the connection between the good' and the just' in urban life? Rather than philosophizing the good' and proper life in cities, the book considers what happens when urban conflicts and urban futures are carried out as conflicts over the good and proper life in cities. It offers an understanding of how ethical discourses, ideals and values are harmonized with material interests of different groups, taking up cases studies about environmental protection, co-housing schemes, political protest, heritage preservation, participatory planning, collaborative art production, and other topics from different eras and parts of the globe. This book offers multidisciplinary insights, ethnographic research and conceptual tools and resources to explore and better understand such conflicts. It questions the ways in which urban ethics draw on tacit moral economies of urban life and the ways in which such moral economies become explicit, political and programmatic. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910972477603321 |
|
|
Autore |
Manasse Paolo |
|
|
Titolo |
Procyclical Fiscal Policy : : Shocks, Rules, and Institutions: A View From Mars / / Paolo Manasse |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Washington, D.C. : , : International Monetary Fund, , 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
9786613828477 |
9781462328628 |
1462328628 |
9781451998450 |
1451998457 |
9781283516020 |
1283516020 |
9781451908237 |
1451908237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[1st ed.] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (41 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Fiscal policy - Econometric models |
Business cycles - Econometric models |
Comparative or Joint Analysis of Fiscal and Monetary Policy |
Debt Management |
Debt |
Debts, Public |
Economic theory |
Fiscal Policy |
Fiscal policy |
Fiscal rules |
Fiscal stance |
Macroeconomics |
Macroeconomics: Production |
National Deficit Surplus |
Neural Networks and Related Topics |
Output gap |
Positive Analysis of Policy-Making and Implementation |
Production and Operations Management |
Production |
Public debt |
Public finance & taxation |
Public Finance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sovereign Debt |
Stabilization |
Treasury Policy |
Czech Republic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references (p. 36-39). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
""Contents""; ""I. INTRODUCTION""; ""II. REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE""; ""III. METHODOLOGY""; ""IV. THE DATA""; ""V. ESTIMATION RESULTS""; ""VI. CONCLUSIONS""; ""References"" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
This paper assesses the roles of shocks, rules, and institutions as possible sources of procyclicality in fiscal policy. By employing parametric and nonparametric techniques, I reach the following four main conclusions. First, policymakers' reactions to the business cycle is different depending on the state of the economy-fiscal policy is "acyclical" during economic bad times, while it is largely procyclical during good times. Second, fiscal rules and fiscal responsibility laws tend to reduce the deficit bias on average, and seem to enhance, rather than to weaken, countercyclical policy. However, the evidence also suggests that fiscal frameworks do not exert independent effects when the quality of institutions is accounted for. Third, strong institutions are associated to a lower deficit bias, but their effect on procyclicality is different in good and bad times, and it is subject to decreasing returns. Fourth, unlike developed countries, fiscal policy in developing countries is procyclical even during (moderate) recessions; in "good times," however, fiscal policy is actually more procyclical in developed economies. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |