1.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910768476103321

Autore

Dietzfelbinger Martin

Titolo

Primality Testing in Polynomial Time : From Randomized Algorithms to "PRIMES Is in P" / / by Martin Dietzfelbinger

Pubbl/distr/stampa

Berlin, Heidelberg : , : Springer Berlin Heidelberg : , : Imprint : Springer, , 2004

ISBN

9783540259336 (e-book)

9783540403449 (pbk.)

Edizione

[1st ed. 2004.]

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource (x, 147 p.)

Collana

Lecture Notes in Computer Science, , 1611-3349 ; ; 3000

Disciplina

512.942

Soggetti

Number theory

Algebra

Algorithms

Computer science

Cryptography

Data encryption (Computer science)

Computer science - Mathematics

Mathematical statistics

Number Theory

Theory of Computation

Cryptology

Probability and Statistics in Computer Science

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Nota di bibliografia

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Nota di contenuto

1. Introduction: Efficient Primality Testing -- 2. Algorithms for Numbers and Their Complexity -- 3. Fundamentals from Number Theory -- 4. Basics from Algebra: Groups, Rings, and Fields -- 5. The Miller-Rabin Test -- 6. The Solovay-Strassen Test -- 7. More Algebra: Polynomials and Fields -- 8. Deterministic Primality Testing in Polynomial Time -- A. Appendix.

Sommario/riassunto

On August 6, 2002,a paper with the title “PRIMES is in P”, by M. Agrawal, N. Kayal, and N. Saxena, appeared on the website of the Indian Institute of Technology at Kanpur, India. In this paper it was



shown that the “primality problem”hasa“deterministic algorithm” that runs in “polynomial time”. Finding out whether a given number n is a prime or not is a problem that was formulated in ancient times, and has caught the interest of mathema- ciansagainandagainfor centuries. Onlyinthe 20thcentury,with theadvent of cryptographic systems that actually used large prime numbers, did it turn out to be of practical importance to be able to distinguish prime numbers and composite numbers of signi?cant size. Readily, algorithms were provided that solved the problem very e?ciently and satisfactorily for all practical purposes, and provably enjoyed a time bound polynomial in the number of digits needed to write down the input number n. The only drawback of these algorithms is that they use “randomization” — that means the computer that carries out the algorithm performs random experiments, and there is a slight chance that the outcome might be wrong, or that the running time might not be polynomial. To ?nd an algorithmthat gets by without rand- ness, solves the problem error-free, and has polynomial running time had been an eminent open problem in complexity theory for decades when the paper by Agrawal, Kayal, and Saxena hit the web.