| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNISA990003250100203316 |
|
|
Autore |
ABRAMI, Licio |
|
|
Titolo |
Il nuovo bilancio degli enti creditizi e finanziari : Appendice di aggiornamento : con il commento alle modifiche apportate al Decreto legislativo 27-1-1992, n. 87 e al Decreto del Presidente della Repubblica 22-12-1986, n. 917 / Licio Abrami |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Aziende di credito - Bilancio - Legislazione |
Intermediari finanziari - Legislazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collocazione |
|
332 ABR 2a (IRA 31 180 APP) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910767571503321 |
|
|
Titolo |
Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems : First International Workshop, ArgMAS 2004, New York, NY, USA, July 19, 2004, Revised Selected and Invited Papers / / edited by Iyad Rahwan, Pavlos Moraitis, Chris Reed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Berlin, Heidelberg : , : Springer Berlin Heidelberg : , : Imprint : Springer, , 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
3-540-32261-2 |
3-540-24526-X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[1st ed. 2005.] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (XII, 263 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, , 2945-9141 ; ; 3366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Altri autori (Persone) |
|
RahwanIyad |
MoraitisPavlos |
ReedChris <1956-> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Language and languages - Style |
Artificial intelligence |
Computer networks |
User interfaces (Computer systems) |
Human-computer interaction |
Natural language processing (Computer science) |
Stylistics |
Artificial Intelligence |
Computer Communication Networks |
User Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction |
Natural Language Processing (NLP) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Papers presented at a workshop held at Columbia University, New York in July 2004. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Foundations of Dialogues -- Some Preliminary Steps Towards a Meta-theory for Formal Inter-agent Dialogues -- Towards a Formal and Implemented Model of Argumentation Schemes in Agent Communication -- Formal Dialectic Specification -- A Modal Semantics for an Argumentation-Based Pragmatics for Agent Communication -- Layered Strategies and Protocols for Argumentation-Based Agent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interaction -- Belief Revision -- Revising Beliefs Through Arguments: Bridging the Gap Between Argumentation and Belief Revision in MAS -- An Argument-Based Framework to Model an Agent’s Beliefs in a Dynamic Environment -- Argumentation in Bayesian Belief Networks -- Persuasion & Deliberation -- Specifying and Implementing a Persuasion Dialogue Game Using Commitments and Arguments -- A Dialogue Game Protocol for Multi-agent Argument over Proposals for Action -- A Denotational Semantics for Deliberation Dialogues -- Negotiation -- Bargaining and Argument-Based Negotiation: Some Preliminary Comparisons -- On the Generation of Bipolar Goals in Argumentation-Based Negotiation -- A Bayes Net Approach to Argumentation Based Negotiation -- Negotiation Among DDeLP Agents -- Strategic Issues -- Is It Worth Arguing? -- When Is It Okay to Lie? A Simple Model of Contradiction in Agent-Based Dialogues. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
The theory of argumentation is a rich, interdisciplinary area of research lying across philosophy, communication studies, linguistics, and psychology (at least). Its techniques and results have found a wide range of applications in both t- oretical and practical branches of arti'cial intelligence and computer science. Several theories of argumentation with various semantics have been proposed in the literature. Multi-agent systems theory has picked up argument-inspired approaches and speci'cally argumentation-theoretic results from many di'erent areas. The community of researchers in argumentation and multi-agent systems is currently presented with a unique opportunity to integrate the various und- standings of argument into a coherent and core part of the functioning of - tonomouscomputationalsystems.Thebene'tsrangefromextendedsemanticsof arguments construed as relationships between epistemic atoms, through conv- sation protocols for argumentation with serendipitous information exchange, to models of dialectical practical reasoning, both intra- and inter-agent (and a m- ture of the two). In all these cases argumentation is used to structure knowledge representation, reasoning and agent interaction, and o'ers a potential means of better integrating these disparate problems. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |