|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910765996103321 |
|
|
Autore |
Lindner Johannes <1974-, > |
|
|
Titolo |
Conflict and change in EU budgetary politics / / Johannes Lindner |
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Taylor & Francis, 2006 |
|
New York : , : Routledge, , 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-134-24972-1 |
1-134-24973-X |
1-280-34797-X |
9786610347971 |
0-203-00276-8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[First edition.] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (289 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Routledge advances in European politics ; ; 32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Classificazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Budget - European Union countries |
Debts, Public - European Union countries |
Finance, Public - European Union countries |
Fiscal policy - European Union countries |
Europe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references (p. [245]-260) and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
An institutionalist perspective on conflict in EU budgetary politics -- A rational choice-institutionalist explanation of conflict in EU budgetary politics -- Obstructing decision-making -- Facilitating decision-making -- Blocking intergovernmental relations -- Accepting intergovernmental burden sharing -- Summary of the findings and update of the theoretical explanation -- A rational choice-institutionalist explanation of institutional change in EU budgetary politics -- Resisting reform -- Initiating a new institutional path. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
Why did the European Union experience a stark variation in the levels of conflict between the late 1970s, when budgetary disputes dominated European politics, and the 1990s, when political actors were able to settle upon budgetary agreements without major conflicts? This book responds to this key question with a two-step argument: Its first part |
|
|
|
|