| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910765528503321 |
|
|
Titolo |
Le retour des mythes antiques dans la poésie lyrique du siècle d'Or |
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Montpellier, : Presses universitaires de la Méditerranée, 2022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (296 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Voix des Suds et des Orients |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Literary studies: general |
Literary studies: poetry & poets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
Le recours à la mythologie, engagé en Espagne, dans l'enthousiasme mimétique du XVIe siècle, s'est poursuivi dans la fureur du baroque jusqu'au XVIIesiècle. Non, la Fable ne fut pas l'aliment d'une « froide rhétorique » ou un « appareil de divinités poussiéreuses », selon la critique généralement partagée, mais un opérateur palpitant, « l'âme de la poésie ». Manifestation médiatrice du lyrisme où le réel et le surnaturel se confondent dans le jeu subtil entre l'univers divin et l'univers humain. Une dimension esthétique sacrée de la poésie, parfaitement admise dans une Espagne éprise d'orthodoxie, l'occasion d'un admirable syncrétisme pagano-chrétien. Il fallait être aveugle pour ne pas voir la prodigieuse originalité que donnaient aux mythes les poètes du siècle d'Or dont nous étudions deux des principaux représentants : Garcilaso et Góngora. Mobilisant le potentiel fictionnel de la mythologie, ils ont repoussé les limites de la poéticité. Chacun est soumis à une triple analyse exploratoire : un examen quantitatif des fragments mythiques, une appréhension linguistique de leurs multiples fonctions, objet d'un authentique projet poétique rendu par une pénétrante géométrie dénotant l'unité singulière de leur paysage imaginaire. Le tout aboutissant à prouver que, chez un authentique poète, jamais rien n'est inutile, surtout pas la mythologie. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910953315503321 |
|
|
Titolo |
Freedom of analysis? / / edited by Sylvia Blaho, Patrik Bye, Martin Kramer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Berlin ; ; New York, : Mouton de Gruyter, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
9786612194498 |
9781282194496 |
1282194496 |
9783110198591 |
3110198592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[1st ed.] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (396 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Studies in generative grammar ; ; 95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Classificazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Altri autori (Persone) |
|
BlahoSylvia <1979-> |
ByePatrik |
KrämerMartin <1969-> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Grammar, Comparative and general - Phonology |
Generative grammar |
Optimality theory (Linguistics) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references (p. 367-372) and indexes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Frontmatter -- Contents -- Chapter 1 Freedom of Analysis? -- Chapter 2 Laryngeal Underspecification and Richness of the Base -- Chapter 3 Underlying representations that do not minimize grammatical violations -- Chapter 4 Allomorphy - selection, not optimization -- Chapter 5 A freer input: Yowlumne opacity and the Enriched Input Model -- Chapter 6 Derived Environment Effects and Consistency of Exponence -- Chapter 7 Colored turbid accents and containment: A case study from lexical stress -- Chapter 8 Freedom, Interpretability, and the Loop -- Chapter 9 Restraint of Analysis -- Chapter 10 The roles of GEN and CON in modeling ternary rhythm -- Chapter 11 Representational complexity in syllable structure and its consequences for GEN and CON -- Chapter 12 Restricting GEN -- Chapter 13 The division of labor between segment-internal structure and violable constraints -- Chapter 14 Variables in Optimality Theory -- Backmatter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
This volume draws together papers that argue for a renewed focus on the role of hard constraints on phonological representations as well as the processes that operate on them. These are issues that have been sidelined since the shift in emphasis in phonological research to functionally grounded output-oriented constraints. Taking Optimality Theory as their starting point, the articles attack the question to what degree the Generator function Gen should be given freedom of analysis on three fronts. (1) What is the nature of the representations that Gen manipulates? Is a return to more articulated theories of segmental and prosodic representation desirable? (2) What restrictions might there be on the operations that Gen carries out on representations? Should Gen be endowed with structure-changing potential, as assumed in work couched within Correspondence Theory, or is a return to the principle of Containment preferable? Should Gen be restricted in the number of edits it can carry out at any one time? Should Gen be restricted to generating phonetically interpretable candidates? (3) What is the relationship between Gen and functionally arbitrary or opaque phonological patterns? Should Gen's freedom be restricted in order to account for language-specific phonology? The solutions offered to these questions bear significantly on current issues that are of fundamental concern in linguistic theory, including representations, parallelism vs. serialism, and the division of labour between linguistic modules. The authors scrutinize these issues using data from a variety of unrelated languages, including Czech, English, Greek, Haitian Creole, Hawaiian, Lardil, Spanish, Turkish, and Yowlumne. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |