1.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910726487403321

Titolo

The educational and developmental psychologist

Pubbl/distr/stampa

Cambridge, England : , : Cambridge University Press, , 2016-

[England?] : , : Taylor & Francis

ISSN

2059-0784

Disciplina

370.1505

Soggetti

Developmental psychology

Educational psychology

Psychologie du développement

Psychopédagogie

Periodicals.

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Periodico

Note generali

Refereed/Peer-reviewed



2.

Record Nr.

UNINA9911010534503321

Autore

Tu Wenyan

Titolo

The Accountability Paradox in the Chinese Bureaucracy / / by Wenyan Tu

Pubbl/distr/stampa

Singapore : , : Springer Nature Singapore : , : Imprint : Palgrave Macmillan, , 2026

ISBN

981-9663-92-X

Edizione

[1st ed. 2026.]

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource (323 pages)

Collana

Political Science and International Studies

Disciplina

320.95

Soggetti

Asia - Politics and government

Asia - Economic conditions

Organizational sociology

Occupations - Sociological aspects

Asian Politics

Asian Economics

Sociology of Organizations and Occupations

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Nota di contenuto

Chapter 1: Introduction: The Accountability Paradox in the Chinese Bureaucracy -- Chapter 2: The Control of Bureaucracy -- Chapter 3: Accountability Transformation in the Chinese Bureaucracy -- Chapter 4: Accountability Intensity and Bureaucratic Shirking -- Chapter 5: The Accountability Cube and Blame Avoidance -- Chapter 6: Accountability Conflicts and Bureaucrats’ Working Effort -- Chapter 7: Fault-Tolerance Mechanism: A Compromise between Outcome-Based Accountability and Process-Based Accountability -- Chapter 8: Promoting Good Accountability: What Should Be Done.

Sommario/riassunto

This book explores the accountability paradox in the Chinese bureaucracy. The purpose of accountability is to foster compliance and responsiveness among bureaucrats, but instead, it causes bureaucrats’ coping tactics, blame-avoiding strategies, and defensive behavior, which constitutes a paradox or pathology of accountability. The accountability paradox is well documented in Western countries, but scarce attention has been paid to the accountability system in the



Chinese context. It appears that the accountability paradox is also present in the Chinese context since a series of major transformations were initiated to overhaul the accountability system in China following the 18th National Party Congress in 2012, but exhibits characteristics that are unique to China. In a tightly argued book driven by comprehensive interviews and survey investigations, Dr. Tu sheds light on a subject of interest to sinologists, political scientists, and journalists. Wenyan Tu is assistant professor of the Institute for Global Public Policy, Fudan University, China. Her research interests cover corruption studies, public accountability, and bureaucratic incentives. She has published in journals such as Public Management Review, Government Information Quarterly, China Quarterly, China Review, Public Personnel Management, and Administration & Society.