1.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910711792103321

Autore

Paulsen Carl G.

Titolo

Surface water supply of the United States, 1939 . Part 2 South Atlantic slope and eastern Gulf of Mexico basins / / Carl G. Paulsen [and six others]

Pubbl/distr/stampa

[Washington, D.C.] : , : United States Department of the Interior, Geological Survey, , 1941

Washington : , : United States Government Printing Office

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource (ix, 388 pages) : illustrations

Collana

Water-supply paper ; ; 872

Soggetti

Water quality - South Atlantic States

Water quality - Atlantic Coast

Water quality - Mexico, Gulf of

Water resources development - South Atlantic States

Water resources development - Atlantic Coast

Water resources development - Mexico, Gulf of

Water-supply - South Atlantic States

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Note generali

"Prepared in cooperation with the states of Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Virginia."

Includes tables.

Nota di bibliografia

Includes index.



2.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910806944603321

Autore

Eemeren F. H. van (Frans Hendrik), <1946->

Titolo

Argumentation between doctors and patients : understanding clinical argumentative discourse / / Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, Nanon Labrie

Pubbl/distr/stampa

Amsterdam ; ; Philadelphia : , : John Benjamins Publishing Company, , [2021]

©2021

ISBN

90-272-6010-9

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource (167 pages)

Disciplina

610.696

Soggetti

Medical consultation

Medical cooperation

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Sommario/riassunto

"Argumentation between Doctors and Patients discusses the use of argumentation in clinical settings. Starting from the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation, it aims at providing an understanding of argumentative discourse in the context of doctor-patient interaction. It explains when and how interactions between doctors and patients can be reconstructed as argumentative, what it means for doctors and patients to reasonably resolve a difference of opinion, what it implies to strive simultaneously for reasonableness and effectiveness in clinical discourse, and when such efforts derail into fallaciousness. Argumentation between Doctors and Patients is of interest to all those who seek to improve their understanding of argumentation in a medical context - whether they are students, scholars of argumentation, or medical practitioners. Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen and Nanon Labrie are prominent argumentation theorists. In writing Argumentation between Doctors and Patients, they have benefited from the advice of an Advisory Board consisting of both medical practitioners and argumentation scholars"--