| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910707437003321 |
|
|
Autore |
Ensign C. Robert |
|
|
Titolo |
MEGA16: computer program for analysis and extrapolation of stress-rupture data / / C. Robert Ensign |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
[Washington, D.C.] : , : National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Scientific and Technical Information Branch, , May 1981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (44 pages) : illustrations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
NASA technical paper ; ; 1809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Computer programs |
Creep rupture strength |
FORTRAN |
Plotting |
Stress analysis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Title from title screen (viewed on Aug. 25, 2016). |
"May 1981." |
"Performing Organization: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Lewis Research Center"--Report documentation page. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references (page 44). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910146496703321 |
|
|
Titolo |
ECBS 2005: 12th International Conference and Workshop on Engineering of Computer-Based Systems (04-07 April 2005/Greenbelt, MD) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
[Place of publication not identified], : IEEE Computer Society Press, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Altri autori (Persone) |
|
RozenblitJerzy |
O'NeillTim |
PengJianfeng |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Systems engineering |
Systems engineering - Decision making |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
12th IEEE International Conference and Workshops on the Engineering of Computer-Based Systems - Cover -- 12th IEEE International Conference and Workshops on the Engineering of Computer-Based Systems - Title Page -- Proceedings. 12th IEEE International Conference and Workshops on the Engineering of Computer-Based Systems -- 12th IEEE International Conference and Workshops on the Engineering of Computer-Based Systems - Table of contents -- Foreword -- Conference organization -- Model integrated computing: foundations and applications -- A generic component framework for high performance locally concurrent computing based on UML 2.0 activities -- Notice of Violation of IEEE Publication Principles: Using connectors to integrate software components -- Components and contracts for embedded software -- Parallel and reliable execution of a WDR algorithm in high speed networks -- A unified formal specification for a multi-consistency replication system for DHTs -- Dependency algebra: a theoretical framework for dependency management in real-time control systems -- Integrative architecture elicitation for large computer based systems -- The ABACUS architectural approach to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
computer-based system and enterprise evolution -- Heuristic-based architecture generation for complex computer system optimisation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
A variety of life cycle models for software systems development are generally available. However, it is generally difficult to compare and contrast the methods and very little literature is available to guide developers and managers in making choices. Moreover in order to make informed decisions developers require access to real data that compares the different models and the results associated with the adoption of each model. This paper describes an experiment in which fifteen software teams developed comparable software products using four different development approaches (V-model, incremental, evolutionary and extreme programming). Extensive measurements were taken to assess the time, quality, size, and development efficiency of each product. The paper presents the experimental data collected and the conclusions related to the choice of method, its impact on the project and the quality of the results as well as the general implications to the practice of systems engineering project management. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |