| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910704914203321 |
|
|
Titolo |
Hearing on National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 and oversight of previously authorized programs before the Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives, One Hundred Thirteenth Congress, first session : full committee hearing on national defense priorities from members for the fiscal year 2014 National Defense Authorization Act, hearing held May 8, 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Washington : , : U.S. Government Printing Office, , 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (iv, 179 pages) : illustrations, maps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Families of military personnel - Services for - United States - Finance |
Legislative hearings. |
United States Armed Forces Appropriations and expenditures |
United States Armed Forces Procurement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Title from title screen (viewed on December 26, 2013). |
Paper version available for sale by the Superintendent of Documents., U.S. Government Printing Office |
"H.A.S.C. no. 113-43." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910781154403321 |
|
|
Titolo |
Causal categories in discourse and cognition [[electronic resource] /] / edited by Ted Sanders, Eve Sweetser |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
New York, NY, : Mouton de Gruyter, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-282-71509-7 |
9786612715099 |
3-11-022442-9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (260 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Cognitive linguistics research ; ; 44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Altri autori (Persone) |
|
SandersTed <1963-> |
SweetserEve |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Psycholinguistics |
Causation |
Causative (Linguistics) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Frontmatter -- Table of contents -- Introduction: Causality in language and cognition - what causal connectives and causal verbs reveal about the way we think / Sanders, Ted / Sweetser, Eve -- Causality, cognition and communication: A mental space analysis of subjectivity in causal connectives / Sanders, Ted / Sanders, José / Sweetser, Eve -- Causal Connectives in Dutch Biblical Translations A cognitive linguistic approach / Sanders, José -- Causes and consequences: Evidence from Polish, English, and Dutch / Dancygier, Barbara -- Categories of subjectivity in Dutch causal connectives: a usage-based analysis / Stukker, Ninke / Sanders, Ted / Verhagen, Arie -- Causes for causatives: the case of Dutch doen and laten / Speelman, Dirk / Geeraerts, Dirk -- Causal categories in discourse - Converging evidence from language use / Sanders, Ted / Spooren, Wilbert -- Backmatter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
All languages of the world provide their speakers with linguistic means to express causal relations in discourse. Causal connectives and causative auxiliaries are among the salient markers of causal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
construals. Cognitive scientists and linguists are interested in how much of this causal modeling is specific to a given culture and language, and how much is characteristic of general human cognition. Speakers of English, for example, can choose between because and since or between therefore and so. How different are these from the choices made by Dutch speakers, who speak a closely related language, but (unlike English speakers) have a dedicated marker for non-volitional causality (daardoor)? The central question in this volume is: What parameters of categorization shape the use of causal connectives and auxiliary verbs across languages? The book discusses how differences between even quite closely related languages (English, Dutch, Polish) can help us to elaborate the typology of levels and categories of causation represented in language. In addition, the volume demonstrates convergence of linguistic, corpus-linguistic and psycholinguistic methodologies in determining cognitive categories of causality. The basic notion of causality appears to be an ideal linguistic phenomenon to provide an overview of methods and, perhaps more importantly, invoke a discussion on the most adequate methodological approaches to study fundamental issues in language and cognition. |
|
|
|
|
|
| |