| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910699580103321 |
|
|
Titolo |
Equal Justice for Our Military Act of 2010 [[electronic resource] ] : report together with dissenting views (to accompany H.R. 569) (including cost estimate of the Congressional Budget Office) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
[Washington, D.C.] : , : [U.S. G.P.O.], , [2010] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (18 pages) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Report / 111th Congress, 2d session, House of Representatives ; ; 111-547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Appellate procedure - United States |
Military offenses - Government policy - United States |
Courts-martial and courts of inquiry - Government policy - United States |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Title from title screen (viewed on Aug. 9, 2010). |
"July 15, 2010." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910795025303321 |
|
|
Autore |
ten Have H. |
|
|
Titolo |
Bizarre bioethics : ghosts, monsters, and pilgrims / / Henk A. M. J. ten Have |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Baltimore, Maryland : , : Johns Hopkins University Press, , [2022] |
|
©2022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[1st ed.] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (314 pages) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Bizarre bioethics -- The establishment of bioethics -- Ghosts -- Monsters -- Pilgrims -- Prophets -- Relics -- Critical bioethics. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
"Current bioethical debate is bizarre because it concentrates on exceptional cases while it does not pay attention to underlying value perspectives that determine the agenda of the debate"-- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |