Too much, too long? [[electronic resource] ] : domestic violence in the workplace : hearing before the Subcommittee on Employment and Workplace Safety of the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions, United States Senate, One Hundred Tenth Congress, first session, on examining domestic violence in the workplace, April 17, 2007

• Record Nr.: UNINA9910698012303321
• Pubbl/distr/stampa: Washington : , : U.S. G.P.O., , 2009
• Descrizione fisica: iii, 91 pages : digital, PDF file
• Collana: S. hrg. ; ; 110-647
• Soggetti: Violence in the workplace - United States - Prevention; Work environment - United States - Safety measures; Family violence - United States - Prevention; Victims of family violence - Services for - United States; Employee assistance programs - United States
• Lingua di pubblicazione: Inglese
• Formato: Materiale a stampa
• Livello bibliografico: Monografia
• Note generali: Title from title screen (viewed on Mar. 2, 2009).; Paper version available for sale by the Supt. of Docs., U.S. G.P.O.
• Nota di bibliografia: Includes bibliographical references.

Why public higher education should be free : how to decrease costs and increase quality at American universities / / Robert Samuels

• Record Nr.: UNINA9910822727803321
• Autore: Samuels Robert <1961->
• Pubbl/distr/stampa: New Brunswick, New Jersey : , : Rutgers University Press, , [2013]; ©2013
• ISBN: 0-8135-6124-8; 0-8135-6125-6
• Descrizione fisica: 1 online resource (192 p.)
• Disciplina: 378.1/06
• Soggetti: Universities and colleges - United States - Finance; Educational accountability - United States
• Lingua di pubblicazione: Inglese
• Formato: Materiale a stampa
• Livello bibliografico: Monografia
• Note generali: Description based upon print version of record.
• Nota di bibliografia: Includes bibliographical references and index.
• Nota di contenuto: Why tuition goes up and quality goes down -- Where the money goes in research universities -- Shortchanging undergraduate instruction -- The role of faculty and graduate students -- The rise of the administrative class -- The university as hedge fund -- The high cost of research -- Technology to the rescue? -- Making all public higher education free -- Educating students for a multicultural democracy.
• Sommario/riassunto: Universities tend to be judged by the test scores of their incoming students and not on what students actually learn once they attend these institutions. While shared tests and surveys have been developed, most schools refuse to publish the results. Instead, they allow such publications as U.S. News & World Report to define educational quality. In order to raise their status in these rankings, institutions pour money into new facilities and extracurricular activities while underfunding their educational programs. In Why Public Higher Education Should Be Free, Robert Samuels argues that many institutions of higher education squander funds and mislead the public about such things as average class size, faculty-to-student ratios, number of faculty with PhDs, and other indicators of educational quality. Parents and students seem to have little knowledge of how colleges and universities have been restructured over the past thirty years. Samuels shows how research ; universities have begun to function as giant investment banks or hedge funds that spend money on athletics and administration while increasing tuition costs and actually lowering the quality of undergraduate education. In order to fight higher costs and lower quality, Samuels suggests, universities must reallocate these misused funds and concentrate on their core mission of instruction and related research. Throughout the book, Samuels argues that the future of our economy and democracy rests on our ability to train students to be thoughtful participants in the production and analysis of knowledge. If leading universities serve only to grant credentials and prestige, our society will suffer irrevocable harm. Presenting the problem of how universities make and spend money, Samuels provides solutions to make these important institutions less expensive and more vital. By using current resources in a more effective manner, we could even, he contends, make all public higher education free.