1.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910688347503321

Autore

Steinmetz Willibald

Titolo

Begegnungen vor Gericht : Eine Sozial- und Kulturgeschichte des englischen Arbeitsrechts (1850-1925) / / Willibald Steinmetz; German Historical Institute London

Pubbl/distr/stampa

De Gruyter, 2002

Berlin ; ; Boston : , : Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag, , [2012]

©2002

ISBN

3-486-70765-5

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource (728 pages) : digital, PDF file(s)

Collana

Veröffentlichungen des Deutschen Historischen Instituts London/ Publications of the German Historical Institute London ; ; BAND 51

Classificazione

PF 947

Disciplina

340.09

Soggetti

Labor laws and legislation - Great Britain - History

Lingua di pubblicazione

Tedesco

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Note generali

Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph

Nota di bibliografia

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Nota di contenuto

Front Matter -- i. die meistererzählungen und die marginalisierung des individualarbeitsrechts -- ii. die nachlassende attraktivität der gerichte -- iii. schwellen vor dem gang zum gericht -- iv. die gerichtsverhandlung als kommunikationsereignis -- v. definitionskämpfe im gericht -- schluss: die entrechtlichung der arbeitsbeziehungen in england, 1850-1925 -- back matter.

Sommario/riassunto

In April 1909 Charlie Chaplin sued the treasurer of a seaman's mission in West Hartlepool County Court, North East England, for £ 14 and 10 shillings for failing to pay him the agreed wages and rent for a cinematographer and films. The lawsuit of Chaplin, who was just twenty years old and who only later became famous as a film actor, is one of several thousand "encounters in court" that form the starting point and basis for this book. From reports and memos about disputes over wages, layoffs, accidents at work and breaches of contract, a novel and exciting story of English labour law in the industrial age is created. For the first time, Willibald Steinmetz examines the practice of the lower courts in labour disputes and lets not only lawyers, but also laypeople, complainants and employers, have their say. Class judges, high costs, obscure procedures, embarrassing cross-examination were just some of the reasons that gave English workers little chance of success in



court.