| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910688185703321 |
|
|
Titolo |
Trichoderma : technology and uses / / edited by Fernando Cezar Juliatti |
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
London : , : IntechOpen, , 2022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (88 pages) : illustrations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
1. Introductory Chapter: Trichoderma the Versatile Fungus to Soil Plant Pathogens Control and Bioprocess Uses -- 2. Trichoderma: A Biofertilizer and a Bio-Fungicide for Sustainable Crop Production -- 3. Trchoderma Spp.: Their Impact in Crops Diseases Management -- 4. Can Genus Trichoderma Manage Plant Diseases under Organic Agriculture? -- 5. Using Trichoderma to Manage Sclerotia-Producing Phytopathogenic Fungi. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
This book discusses Trichoderma spp. and its molecular aspects and mode of action on important plant pathogens. In Brazil, there are already more than thirty-four species of this fungus registered in commercial products to control soil-borne pathogens. The book also discusses industrial use of Trichoderma. Chapters examine the application of the fungus in the integrated management of plant diseases as well as its general use in bioprocesses and even in the alcohol production industry for biofuels. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910813182903321 |
|
|
Autore |
Young Alasdair R. |
|
|
Titolo |
The new politics of trade : lessons from TTIP / / Alasdair R. Young [[electronic resource]] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Newcastle upon Tyne : , : Agenda Publishing, , 2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-78821-086-7 |
1-911116-76-2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (xv, 160 pages) : digital, PDF file(s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Comparative political economy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
European Union countries Foreign economic relations United States |
United States Foreign economic relations European Union countries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 09 Aug 2023). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references (pages 137-154) and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
The negotiation of international trade agreements has become the issue of the moment. With Brexit, a change in administration in the United States, a fragile economic recovery in the Eurozone and China facing a slowdown in its growth, nothing is more critical to the future global economy than the terms of trade between its largest economic blocs. The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) is Europe's most controversial trade agreement ever. Aimed at reducing regulatory barriers between the United States and the EU, it was expected to be fairly straightforward given strong business support on both sides of the Atlantic. It has not been so. The negotiations have dragged on far longer than anticipated and now look set to fail altogether. Yet the process of its negotiation, the terms of the potential agreement and its sticking points provide valuable lessons for policy-makers and academics tasked to bring future trade deals and arrangements to successful conclusions. <br><br> Alasdair Young offers a penetrating analysis of the complexities of the TTIP negotiations and explores why they have proved so difficult to conclude, what motivates the different parties concerned and what implications there are for politics and policy. Young throws light on the limits of the transatlantic cooperation and the processes of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
globalization and teases out the implications for the UK in its post-Brexit trade negotiations and for other nations now facing a more protectionist stance from the United States. |
|
|
|
|
|
| |