1.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910676688903321

Autore

Ward Max M. <1973->

Titolo

Thought crime : ideology and state power in interwar Japan / / Max M. Ward

Pubbl/distr/stampa

Durham : , : Duke University Press, , 2019

ISBN

1-4780-9229-7

1-4780-0274-3

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource (313 pages)

Collana

Asia Pacific

Disciplina

345.52023109042

Soggetti

Lese majesty - Law and legislation - Japan - History - 20th century

Political crimes and offenses - Japan - History - 20th century

Japan Politics and government 1926-1945

Japan Politics and government 1912-1945

Japan History 1912-1945

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Nota di bibliografia

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Nota di contenuto

Kokutai and the aporias of imperial sovereignty : the passage of the Peace Preservation Law in 1925 -- Transcriptions of power : repression and rehabilitation in the early Peace Preservation Law apparatus, 1925-1933 -- Apparatuses of subjection : the rehabilitation of thought criminals in the early 1930s -- Nurturing the ideological avowal : toward the codification of tenkō in 1936 -- The ideology of conversion : tenkō on the eve of total war.

Sommario/riassunto

In Thought Crime Max M. Ward explores the Japanese state's efforts to suppress political radicalism in the 1920s and 1930s. Ward traces the evolution of an antiradical law called the Peace Preservation Law, from its initial application to suppress communism and anticolonial nationalism—what authorities deemed thought crime—to its expansion into an elaborate system to reform and ideologically convert thousands of thought criminals throughout the Japanese Empire. To enforce the law, the government enlisted a number of nonstate actors, who included monks, family members, and community leaders. Throughout, Ward illuminates the complex processes through which the law articulated imperial ideology and how this ideology was transformed



and disseminated through the law's application over its twenty-year history. In so doing, he shows how the Peace Preservation Law provides a window into understanding how modern states develop ideological apparatuses to subject their respective populations.