| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910645888403321 |
|
|
Autore |
Jones Emma R. |
|
|
Titolo |
Being as Relation in Luce Irigaray / / by Emma R. Jones |
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Cham : , : Springer International Publishing : , : Imprint : Palgrave Macmillan, , 2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
9783031193057 |
9783031193040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[1st ed. 2023.] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (172 pages) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Feminism |
Feminist theory |
Continental philosophy |
Social sciences - Philosophy |
Psychoanalysis |
Feminism and Feminist Theory |
Continental Philosophy |
Social Philosophy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
1. Introduction: Being and Sexuate Difference -- 2. Relation and RefusaL: Irigaray and Lacan -- 3. Hearing Silence, Speaking Language: Irigaray and Heidegger -- 4. The Enunciation of Place: Dialogues -- 5. Speaking at the Limit: Ethics, Ontology, Language -- 6. Love and (Re) Birth at the Limit. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
Many scholars have struggled with Irigaray’s focus on sexuate difference, in particular with her claim that it is “ontological,” wondering if this implies a problematically naïve or essentialist account of sexuate difference. As a result, the ethical vision which Irigaray elaborates has not been taken up in a robust way in the fields of philosophy, feminism, or psychoanalysis. By tracing the notion of relation throughout Irigaray’s work, this book identifies a rigorous philosophical continuity between the three self-identified “phases” in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Irigaray’s thought (despite some critics’ concerns that there is a discontinuity between these phases) and clarifies the relational ontology that underlies Irigaray’s conceptualization of sexuate difference – one that always already implies an ethical project. The text demonstrates that an understanding of Irigaray’s Heideggerian inheritance – especially prominent in her later texts – is essential to grasping the sense of the idea that sexuate difference is ontological – it concerns Being, rather than beings. This book further develops potential applications of this ontological notion of a “relational limit” for the fields of philosophy, feminism, and psychotherapy. |
|
|
|
|
|
| |