| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910629300203321 |
|
|
Autore |
Wang Yiming |
|
|
Titolo |
Judicial Transparency in China : Theory and Realization Path / / by Yiming Wang, He Tian |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Singapore : , : Springer Nature Singapore : , : Imprint : Springer, , 2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[1st ed. 2023.] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (359 pages) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Law and Criminology Series |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Conflict of laws |
International law |
Comparative law |
Law - Philosophy |
Law - History |
Public law |
Private International Law, International and Foreign Law, Comparative Law |
Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History |
Public Law |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Justice: From Mystery to Openness -- Development of Contemporary China’s Judicial Openness System -- The Rationale Behind Judicial Transparency -- Methodologies for Researching Judicial Transparency -- The Overall Situation of China’s Judicial Transparency -- Status Quo of Judicial Transparency in Various Fields -- Promoting More Transparent Justice. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
Based on the Judicial Transparency Index Assessment (2019 and 2020) conducted in China by the Institute of Law of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, this book summarizes and analyzes the current situation of judicial openness in China, using a sample of 218 courts across the country for the study. The book analyzes the ideological and institutional origins of judicial openness and examines the operation of judicial openness through the practical experience of role replacement. By analyzing evaluation data in the fields of audit information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
disclosure, trial information disclosure, judicial enforcement data disclosure, and judicial reform data disclosure, the book points out that the current judicial disclosure has made significant progress, but there are still problems such as unclear disclosure standards, insufficient rigidity in disclosure requirements, and the scope of disclosure still needs to be expanded. The book recommends accelerating the disclosure of judicial legislation, public standards, and strengthening assessment and accountability. |
|
|
|
|
|
| |