|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910576869603321 |
|
|
Autore |
Jurczyk Thomas |
|
|
Titolo |
The Notion of "holy" in Ancient Armenian Texts from the Fifth Century CE : A Comparative Approach Using Digital Tools and Methods / / Thomas Jurczyk |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Bielefeld : , : Bielefeld University Press, , 2022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (381 pages) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Armenian language, Classical |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Cover -- Contents -- Acknowledgements -- 1. Introduction -- 1.1 The Importance of Comparative Notions for the Study of Religion -- 1.2 Overall Structure of This Book -- 2. State of Research -- 2.2 History of Armenia in the Fifth Century CE -- 2.3 The Notion of Holy in the Study of Religion -- 2.4 Historical Notions of Holy -- 2.5 Corpus Linguistics and Distributional Semantics -- 3. Methodology -- 3.2 Text Statistics -- 3.3 Synoptic Tables and Sentence Analysis -- 3.4 Annotation Scheme -- 4. Data -- 4.1 Holy/Sacred English Corpus (HSEC) 4.2 Ancient Armenian Full Text Corpus (AAFTC) and Ancient Armenian Surb Corpus (AASC) -- 5. Examination -- 5.1 Armenian Corpora -- 5.2 English Corpora -- 6. Comparison -- 6.1 Examination of the Individual Semantic Fields -- 6.2 The Comparison -- 7. Conclusion -- 7.1 Results of the Individual Examinations -- 7.2 Overlappings between Surb, Holy, and the Comparative Notion of Holy -- 7.3 Contributions to the History of Religion and the Comparative Notion of Holy -- 7.4 Critical Review of the Methodology -- Bibliography. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
Religious studies have long discussed the comparative notion of holy beyond religious, cultural, and linguistic boundaries. In this book, Thomas Jurczyk conducts a diachronic comparison of the meaning and application of two notions and their related word fields that are commonly associated with a broader comparative notion of holy, namely the Ancient Armenian term surb and its related words and the English word field associated with holy. To compare these two semantic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fields, his methodological approach operates on the principle of distributional semantics and applies, among others, tools and methods from the field of corpus linguistics. |
|
|
|
|
|
| |