|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910557731803321 |
|
|
Autore |
Choi-Fitzpatrick Austin |
|
|
Titolo |
The good drone : how social movements democratize surveillance / / Austin Choi-Fitzpatrick |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Cambridge, Massachusetts : , : The MIT Press, , [2020] |
|
©2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
0-262-35845-X |
0-262-35846-8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (181 pages) : illustrations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Social movements - Technological innovations |
Technology - Social aspects |
Technology - Political aspects |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Introduction : beyond social media -- Emergent and disruptive tools for the public good -- Democratizing surveillance -- Hacking space -- The camera's politics -- Resisting drones/resistance drones -- Some new ideas about protest tech -- Theoretical afterward : the technology of politics, and the politics of technology. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
"'This is a short, engagingly written academic trade-style book looking at aerial technologies-with particular emphasis on drones, followed by satellites, and some bits about balloons and kites-and how those technologies are/have been used for the public good, particularly by the activist and social movement crowd. The author argues that social movements regularly use technology to challenge powerful people and ideas, but that those technologies aren't limited to just social media. He demonstrates the ways different technologies (esp. drones and satellites) act as new tools in the air to transform politics on the ground. As the author writes in the book's introduction, "I wrote this book out of fascination and frustration. Original fascination with our ability to support social movements on the street gave way to frustration with the lack of theoretical resources in social movement theory and the skepticism of some of our movement allies on the |
|
|
|
|