|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910554247603321 |
|
|
Autore |
Horowitz Donald L. |
|
|
Titolo |
Constitutional processes and democratic commitment / / Donald L. Horowitz [[electronic resource]] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
New Haven : , : Yale University Press, , 2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (284 pages) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
The Castle lectures in ethics, politics, and economics |
Yale scholarship online |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Constitutional law |
Democracy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Also issued in print: 2021. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Cover -- Half Title -- Title -- Copyright -- Dedication -- Contents -- Preface -- 1. The Goals of Constitutional Processes -- 2. Knowledge, History, and Visibility -- 3. Starting Conditions -- 4. The Forum and the Method -- 5. Inclusion and Consensus -- 6. Consensus, Compromise, Clarity, and Coherence -- 7. External Advice and the Participation Imperative -- 8. Consensus and Defection: The Case of Sri Lanka -- 9. Shaping a Process -- 10. Processes, Good and Not So Good -- Index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
From one of our leading scholars of comparative constitutionalism, advice for everyone involved in the surprisingly common practice of constitution-writing. Enhancing prospects for democracy is an important objective in the process of creating a new constitution. Donald L. Horowitz argues that constitutional processes ought to be geared to securing commitment to democracy by those who participate in them. Using evidence from numerous constitutional processes, he makes a strong case for a process intended to increase the likelihood of a democratic outcome. He also assesses tradeoffs among various process attributes and identifies some that might impede democratic outcomes. This book provides a fresh perspective on constitutional processes that will interest students and scholars. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|