| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910493234603321 |
|
|
Autore |
Freeman Lisa A. |
|
|
Titolo |
Antitheatricality and the Body Public / / Lisa A. Freeman |
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Philadelphia, Pa. : , : University of Pennsylvania Press, , [2016] |
|
©2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (372 pages) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Theater - Moral and ethical aspects |
Electronic books. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based on print version of record |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Front matter -- Contents -- Introduction. Antitheatricality and the Body Public -- Chapter 1. In the "Publike" Theater of William Prynne's Histrio-Mastix -- Chapter 2. Political Allegiances and Bodies Public: Jeremy Collier's A Short View of the Immorality and Profaneness of the English Stage -- Chapter 3. The Political Economy of Bodies Public Scotland's Douglas Controversy -- Chapter 4. Cultivating a Christian Body Public: The Richmond Theater Fire -- Chapter 5. Adjudicating Bodies Public: in NEA v. Finley -- Notes -- Works Cited -- Index -- Acknowledgments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
Situating the theater as a site of broad cultural movements and conflicts, Lisa A. Freeman asserts that antitheatrical incidents from the English Renaissance to present-day America provide us with occasions to trace major struggles over the nature and balance of power and political authority. In studies of William Prynne's Histrio-mastix (1633), Jeremy Collier's A Short View of the Immorality and Profaneness of the English Stage (1698), John Home's Douglas (1757), the burning of the theater at Richmond (1811), and the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in National Endowment for the Arts v. Finley (1998) Freeman engages in a careful examination of the political, religious, philosophical, literary, and dramatic contexts in which challenges to theatricality unfold. In so doing, she demonstrates that however differently "the public" might be defined in each epoch, what lies at the heart of antitheatrical disputes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
is a struggle over the character of the body politic that governs a nation and the bodies public that could be said to represent that nation. By situating antitheatrical incidents as rich and interpretable cultural performances, Freeman seeks to account fully for the significance of these particular historical conflicts. She delineates when, why, and how anxieties about representation manifest themselves, and traces the actual politics that govern such ostensibly aesthetic and moral debates even today. |
|
|
|
|
|
| |