| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910485041403321 |
|
|
Autore |
Hui Elaine Sio-ieng |
|
|
Titolo |
Hegemonic Transformation : The State, Laws, and Labour Relations in Post-Socialist China / / by Elaine Sio-ieng Hui |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
New York : , : Palgrave Macmillan US : , : Imprint : Palgrave Macmillan, , 2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[1st ed. 2018.] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (XV, 266 p. 6 illus.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Series in Asian Labor and Welfare Policies, , 2730-7964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Political science |
Ethnology - Asia |
Culture |
Economics - Sociological aspects |
Political sociology |
Sociology |
Political Theory |
Asian Culture |
Economic Sociology |
Political Sociology |
Political Science |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
1. Putting the Chinese State in Its Place: The March from Passive Revolution to Hegemony -- 2. The Gramscian Approach to the Chinese State -- 3. The Legal Foundation for Changing State-Capital-Labour Relations -- 4. Workers’ Active Consent -- 5. Workers’ Passive Consent -- 6. Workers’ Refusal to Consent -- 7. Conclusion. . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
This book contends that the Chinese economic reform inaugurated since 1978 has been a top-down passive revolution, in Gramsci’s term, and that after three decades of reform the role of the Chinese state has been changing from steering the passive revolution through coercive tactics to establishing capitalist hegemony. It illustrates that the labour law system is a crucial vehicle through which the Chinese party-state |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
seeks to secure the working class’s consent to the capitalist class’s ethno-political leadership. The labour law system has exercised a double hegemonic effect with regards to the capital-labour relations and state-labour relations through four major mechanisms. However, these effects have influenced the Chinese migrant workers in an uneven manner. The affirmative workers have granted active consent to the ruling class leadership; the indifferent, ambiguous and critical workers have only rendered passive consent while the radical workers has refused to give any consentat all. |
|
|
|
|
|
| |