| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910484211403321 |
|
|
Titolo |
Experts and Consensus in Social Science / / edited by Carlo Martini, Marcel Boumans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Cham : , : Springer International Publishing : , : Imprint : Springer, , 2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[1st ed. 2014.] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (309 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Ethical Economy, Studies in Economic Ethics and Philosophy, , 2211-2707 ; ; 50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Social sciences - Philosophy |
Social sciences and ethics |
Consensus (Social sciences) |
Philosophy |
Social sciences |
Social Sciences |
Philosophy of the Social Sciences |
History of Economic Thought/Methodology |
Methodology of the Social Sciences |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and indexes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Introduction: Experts and Consensus in Social Science / Marcel Boumans, Carlo Martini -- Consensus in Practice -- The Institutional Economics of Stakeholder Consultation -- How Experts Can Contribute to Reduce the Costs of Reaching Compromise Agreements / Frank A. G. den Butter, Sjoerd A. ten Wolde -- Model-Based Consensus / Marcel Boumans -- Explicating Ways of Consensus-Making in Science and Society: Distinguishing the Academic, the Interface and the Meta-Consensus / Laszlo Kosolosky, Jeroen Van Bouwel -- Frameworks of Consensus -- Judgments About the Relevance of Evidence in the Context of Peer Disagreements and Practical Rationality / Amir Konigsberg -- Seeking Consensus in the Social Sciences / Carlo Martini |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- Struggling Over the Soul of Economics: Objectivity Versus Expertise / Julian Reiss -- Attributing Standards of Expertise -- Epistemology as a Social Science: Applying the Neyman-Rubin Model to Explain Expert Beliefs / Aviezer Tucker -- The Expert Economist in Times of Uncertainty / Maria Jimenez-Buedo -- Validating Expert Judgment with the Classical Model / Roger M. Cooke -- The Truth About Accuracy / Filip Buekens, Fred Truyen -- The Democratic Dimension -- Expert Advisers: Why Economic Forecasters Can Be Useful Even When They Are Wrong / Robert Evans -- The Role of Experts in the Condominium Model as Republican (Re-) Solution of Social, Economic, and Political Problems / Rafał Paweł Wierzchosławski -- Private Epistemic Virtue, Public Vices: Moral Responsibility in the Policy Sciences / Merel Lefevere, Eric Schliesser -- Index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
This book brings together the research of philosophers and social scientists. It examines those areas of scientific practice where reliance on the subjective judgment of experts and practitioners is the main source of useful knowledge to address, and, possibly, bring solutions to social problems. A common phenomenon in applications of science is that objective evidence does not point to a single answer, or solution, to a problem. Reliance on subjective judgment, then, becomes necessary, despite the known fact that hunches, even those of putative experts, often provide information that is not very accurate, and that experts are prone to fallacies and biases. The book looks at how experts reach consensus in the social sciences, and which experts are relevant to which problems. This book offers the ingredients for building a normative theory of expertise on the basis of the evidence that social scientists and philosophers have uncovered. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |