Visualizing Atrocity : Arendt, Evil, and the Optics of Thoughtlessness / / Valerie Hartouni

• Record Nr.: UNINA9910480863903321
• Autore: Hartouni Valerie
• Pubbl/distr/stampa: New York, NY : , : New York University Press, , [2012]; ©2012
• ISBN: 0-8147-6976-4; 0-8147-3899-0
• Descrizione fisica: 1 online resource (208 p.)
• Collana: Critical Cultural Communication ; ; 3
• Disciplina: 940.5318092
• Soggetti: Good and evil - Social aspects; Good and evil - Political aspects; Genocide - Germany - History - 20th century; World War, 1939-1945 - Atrocities - Germany; Holocaust, Jewish (1939-1945); War crime trials - Jerusalem - History - 20th century; Electronic books.
• Lingua di pubblicazione: Inglese
• Formato: Materiale a stampa
• Livello bibliografico: Monografia
• Note generali: Description based upon print version of record.
• Nota di bibliografia: Includes bibliographical references and index.
• Nota di contenuto: Front matter -- Contents -- Acknowledgments -- Introduction -- 1. Arendt and the Trial of Adolf Eichmann -- 2. Ideology and Atrocity -- 3. Thoughtlessness and Evil -- 4. “Crimes against the Human Status” Nuremberg and the Image of Evil -- 5. The Banality of Evil -- Notes -- Bibliography -- Index -- About the Author
• Sommario/riassunto: Visualizing Atrocity takes Hannah Arendt’s provocative and polarizing account of the 1961 trial of Nazi official Adolf Eichmann as its point of departure for reassessing some of the serviceable myths that have come to shape and limit our understanding both of the Nazi genocide and totalitarianism’s broader, constitutive, and recurrent features. These myths are inextricably tied to and reinforced viscerally by the atrocity imagery that emerged with the liberation of the concentration camps at the war’s end and played an especially important, evidentiary role in the postwar trials of perpetrators. At the 1945 Nuremberg Tribunal, particular practices of looking and seeing were first ; established with respect to these images that were later reinforced and institutionalized through Eichmann’s trial in Jerusalem as simply part of the fabric of historical fact. They have come to constitute a certain visual rhetoric that now circumscribes the moral and political fields and powerfully assists in contemporary mythmaking about how we know genocide and what is permitted to count as such. In contrast, Arendt’s claims about the “banality of evil” work to disrupt this visual rhetoric. More significantly still, they direct our attention well beyond the figure of Eichmann to a world organized now as then by practices and processes that while designed to sustain and even enhance life work as well to efface it.