| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910480591103321 |
|
|
Autore |
Perek Florent |
|
|
Titolo |
Argument structure in usage-based construction grammar : experimental and corpus-based perspectives / / Florent Perek, University of Basel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Amsterdam ; ; Philadelphia : , : John Benjamins Publishing Company, , [2015] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (256 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Contstructional Approaches to Language, , 1573-594X ; ; 17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Construction grammar |
English language - Verb |
Functionalism (Linguistics) |
Corpora (Linguistics) |
Electronic books. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Revised edition of author's Ph.D. dissertation - Verbs, Constructions, Alternations: Usage-based perspectives on argument realization (Universität Freiburg and Université Lille III, 2012). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Argument Structure in Usage-Based Construction Grammar; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of contents; Acknowledgments; Chapter 1. Introduction; 1.1 Overview: Argument realization; 1.2 Usage-based linguistics; 1.3 Structure of the book; 1.3.1 Part I: Verbs; 1.3.2 Part II: Constructions; 1.3.3 Part III: Alternations; Part I. Verbs; Chapter 2. Usage-based perspectives on verb valency; 2.1 The verb in argument realization; 2.1.1 Projectionist approaches and their limits; 2.1.2 Constructional approaches; 2.2 The division of labor between verbs and constructions |
2.2.1 The problem of mapping form to meaning2.2.2 The need for richer lexical knowledge; 2.3 A usage-based account of verb valency; 2.4 Summary; Chapter 3. Empirical evidence for usage-based valency; 3.1 The hypothesis and its predictions; 3.1.1 The usage-based valency hypothesis; 3.1.2 Existing evidence: Verb biases in language comprehension; 3.2 Assessing cognitive accessibility; 3.2.1 Why these verbs?; 3.2.2 Design; 3.2.3 Stimuli; 3.2.4 Participants and procedure; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2.5 Results; 3.3 Comparison with usage data; 3.3.1 Data collection; 3.3.2 Valency distributions; Sell; Pay; Buy |
3.4 ConclusionPart II. Constructions; Chapter 4. The usage basis of constructional meaning; 4.1 The lexical origin of constructional meaning; 4.1.1 Constructions and constructional meaning; 4.1.2 Distributional biases and their significance; 4.1.3 Experimental evidence; 4.1.4 Evidence from corpus linguistics: Collostructional analysis; 4.1.5 Summary: The usage basis of constructional meaning; 4.2 Problems with the lexical basis of constructions; 4.2.1 The conative construction; Missed contact; Lack of affectedness; Lack of completion; Repetition; Lack of intentionality |
4.2.2 The semantics of the conative construction4.2.3 The conative construction in use; 4.3 Conclusion; Chapter 5. The importance of local generalizations; 5.1 Low-level schemas; 5.1.1 Varying degrees of schematicity; 5.1.2 The status of low-level schemas; 5.1.3 Conclusion: The importance of local generalizations; 5.2 Low-level schemas in the conative construction; 5.2.1 Verb-class-specific constructions; 5.2.2 Verb-class-specific collexeme analysis; Classification of verbs into semantic classes; Operationalization of verb meanings; Methods and results |
Implementation of verb-class-specific collexeme analysis5.2.3 Verbs of ingestion; 5.2.4 Verbs of cutting; 5.2.5 Verbs of pulling; 5.2.6 Verbs of hitting; 5.3 Summary and conclusion; Part III. Alternations; Chapter 6. Alternations as units of linguistic knowledge; 6.1 Argument structure alternations; 6.2 Alternations in construction grammar; 6.3 Alternations as allostructions; 6.3.1 The allostructions model; 6.3.2 The dative allostructions; 6.3.3 The locative allostructions; 6.3.4 Experimental evidence for allostructions; 6.4 Alternation-based productivity; 6.5 Conclusion |
Chapter 7. The usage basis of alternation based productivity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910418322603321 |
|
|
Autore |
Werner Lena |
|
|
Titolo |
Neue Herausforderungen für die Aus- und Weiterbildung in Migrantenunternehmen : Wissenschaft trifft Praxis / / Lena Werner, René Leicht, Monika Münch, Elvira Stegnos (Hrsg.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Berlin/Germany, : Logos Verlag Berlin, 2016 |
|
Berlin, Germany : , : Logos Verlag Berlin GmbH, , [2016] |
|
©2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (vii, 199 pages) : digital file(s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Employees - Training of - Germany |
Immigrants - Education - Germany |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
In diesem Sammelband berichten Akteurinnen und Akteure aus Migrantenorganisationen, Bildungsträgern, kommunaler Verwaltung, Kammern und Forschungseinrichtungen über ihre Erfahrungen und Erkenntnisse bei der Fachkräfteentwicklung in Migrantenunternehmen. Die Impulse zur Entstehung dieses Buches gehen auf einen gleichnamigen Workshop zurück, der von der Landesarbeitsgemeinschaft Migrantenökonomie Baden-Württemberg ausgerichtet wurde und unter bundesweiter Beteiligung stattfand. Der Sammelband umfasst die dort vorgestellten Beiträge von Expertinnen und Experten, die aus ihren jeweiligen beruflichen Kontexten und Perspektiven die Aus- und Weiterbildung in Migrantenunternehmen betrachten. Die Beiträge machen deutlich, dass die Förderung der Aus- und Weiterbildung in Migrantenunternehmen sowohl hinsichtlich der Grundlagen als auch der Zielsetzungen auf neue Füße gestellt werden muss. Denn insgesamt ist ein anderer Blick auf Migrantenunternehmen erforderlich, da die an Quantität ausgerichteten Fragen der Ausbildungsbeteiligung an Bedeutung verlieren, während nunmehr in den Betrieben Herausforderungen ersichtlich werden, die stärker auf |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
eine qualitative Dimension verweisen. |
|
|
|
|
|
| |