1.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910480419203321

Autore

Haines Christian

Titolo

A Desire Called America : Biopolitics, Utopia, and the Literary Commons / / Christian Haines

Pubbl/distr/stampa

New York, NY : , : Fordham University Press, , [2019]

©2019

ISBN

0-8232-8697-5

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource (257 pages)

Disciplina

810.9372

Soggetti

Utopias - United States

Electronic books.

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Nota di contenuto

Front matter -- Contents -- Introduction: Impossibly American -- 1. A Revolutionary Haunt: Utopian Frontiers in William S. Burroughs’s Late Trilogy -- 2. The People and the People: Democracy and Vitalism in Walt Whitman’s 1855 Leaves of Grass -- 3. Nobody’s Wife: Affective Economies of Marriage in Emily Dickinson -- 4. Idle Power: The Riot, the Commune, and Capitalist Time in Thomas Pynchon’s Against the Day -- Coda: Assembling the Future -- Acknowledgments -- Notes -- Index

Sommario/riassunto

Critics of American exceptionalism usually view it as a destructive force eroding the radical energies of social movements and aesthetic practices. In A Desire Called America, Christian P. Haines confronts a troubling paradox: Some of the most provocative political projects in the United States are remarkably invested in American exceptionalism. Riding a strange current of U.S. literature that draws on American exceptionalism only to overturn it in the name of utopian desire, Haines reveals a tradition of viewing the United States as a unique and exemplary political model while rejecting exceptionalism’s commitments to nationalism, capitalism, and individualism. Through Walt Whitman, Emily Dickinson, William S. Burroughs, and Thomas Pynchon, Haines brings to light a radically different version of the American dream—one in which political subjects value an organization



of social life that includes democratic self-governance, egalitarian cooperation, and communal property. A Desire Called America brings utopian studies and the critical discourse of biopolitics to bear upon each other, suggesting that utopia might be less another place than our best hope for confronting authoritarianism, neoliberalism, and a resurgent exclusionary nationalism.