| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910972954203321 |
|
|
Autore |
Davis Martha |
|
|
Titolo |
Scientific papers and presentations / / Martha Davis, Kaaron J. Davis, Marion M. Dunagan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
London, : Academic Press, 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
9781283716727 |
1283716720 |
9780123847287 |
0123847281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[3rd ed.] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (361 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Altri autori (Persone) |
|
DavisKaaron J |
DunaganMarion M |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Technical writing |
Communication of technical information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
"Effective scientific communication." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Front Cover; Scientific Papers and Presentations; Copyright Page; Contents; Preface to the First Edition; Preface to the Second Edition; Preface to the Third Edition; 1. The Semantic Environment of Science; 1.1 The Semantic Environment; 1.2 Basic Semantic Elements in Communication; References; 2. Before You Begin; 2.1 Kinds of Scientific Communication; 2.2 Sources of Help; 2.3 Of Pencils, Mice, and Cyberspace; References; 3. Organizing and Writing a Rough Draft; 3.1 Thinking and Writing; 3.2 Prewriting Exercises; 3.2.1 Think Before You Write; 3.2.2 Talk Before You Write |
3.2.3 Brainstorm, Freewrite, or Make a List on Paper3.2.4 Outline; 3.2.5 Write a Rough Abstract First; 3.2.6 Start in the Middle; 3.2.7 Get Rid of Your Inhibitions; 3.3 Organization and Development; 3.4 Coordinating Organization and Development; 3.4.1 The Point of Emphasis; 3.4.2 Transitions; 3.5 Writing the Rough Draft; 3.6 Examples; References; 4. Searching and Reviewing Scientific Literature; 4.1 Planning the Literature Search; 4.1.1Visit the Library; 4.1.2Allow Time; 4.1.3Isolate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Your Objectives; 4.1.4Document Carefully; 4.1.5Be Selective; 4.1.6Verify |
4.1.7Be Willing to Quit and Create Something Useful4.1.8 Verify Again and Keep Up-to-Date; 4.2 Finding the Literature; 4.3 Selecting and Evaluating the Literature; 4.3.1Sources to Use; 4.3.2Evaluating Sources; 4.3.3Using Unpublished References; 4.4 Reviews; References; 5. The Proposal; 5.1The Graduate Proposal; 5.2 The Grant Proposal; 5.2.1 Content and Form; 5.2.2 Title and Title Page; 5.2.3 Executive Summary or Abstract; 5.2.4 Introduction; 5.2.5 Justification; 5.2.6Literature Review; 5.2.7Methods; 5.2.8Conclusions; 5.2.9References; 5.2.10Budget and Time Frame; 5.2.11Biographical Information |
5.3Other Considerations5.4 Progress Reports; References; 6.Graduate Theses and Dissertations; 6.1The Thesis and your Graduate Program; 6.1.1Graduate College Requirements; 6.1.2Style Sheets; 6.1.3The Library; 6.1.4Your Advisors; 6.1.5Other Professionals; 6.2Avoiding Problems; 6.2.1Get Started Early; 6.2.2Maintain Professional Relationships with Your Advisors; 6.2.3Draw Up a Carefully Planned and Well-Written Proposal; 6.2.4Maintain Accurate, Complete Data; 6.2.5Write the Thesis as Your Work Progresses; 6.2.6Be Proud of the Final Copy; 6.2.7To Publish Is to Build Your Reputation |
6.2.8Last-Minute Jobs Can Delay Graduation6.2.9Finish Before You Go; 6.3Planning the Thesis; 6.4Forms for Theses; 6.4.1The Traditional Thesis or Dissertation; 6.4.2Theses or Dissertations Containing Journal Manuscripts; 6.4.2.1The Master's Thesis Including a Journal Article; 6.4.2.2Doctoral Dissertation Incorporating Journal Manuscripts; 6.4.3Other Formats; 6.5The Thesis Defense; References; 7.Publishing in Scientific Journals; 7.1Planning and Writing the Paper; 7.2Journal Manuscript Contents; 7.3After the Paper is Written; 7.4The Editing and Reviewing Process; References |
8.Style and Accuracy in the Final Draft |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
Electronic publishing and electronic means of text and data presentation have changed enormously since the first edition of this book was published in 1997. The third edition of Scientific Papers and Presentations applies traditional principles to today's modern techniques and the changing needs of up-and-coming academia. Topics include designing visual aids, writing first drafts, reviewing and revising, communicating clearly and concisely, adhering to stylistic principles, presenting data in tables and figures, dealing with ethical and legal issues, and relating science to the lay a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910477325403321 |
|
|
Autore |
Bayer Lenka |
|
|
Titolo |
Sprachgebrauch vs. Spracheinstellung im Tschechischen : Empirische und soziolinguistische Untersuchung in Westböhmen und Prag / Lenka Bayer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Frankfurt a.M, : PH02, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[1st, New ed.] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (321 p.) : , EPDF |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Slavistische Beiträge ; 418 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Peter Lang GmbH, Internationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Einstellung vs. Verhalten - Soziologische und diatopische Variablen - Untersuchungs- und Auswertungsmethoden - Material der Umfrage - Prag - Exkurs: Sprache der audiovisuellen Medien - Auswertung der Umfrage - Beobachtungen und Respondentenkommentare |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
ie erste Ebene der vorliegenden Arbeit tangiert in methodischer Hinsicht das geplante Prager Korpus des gesprochenen Tschechisch. Gesprochene Texte werden aufgenommen, schriftlich fixiert und nach sprachlichen und soziologischen Kriterien geordnet und ausgewertet. Das Ziel ist es, anhand der Aufnahmen die aktuelle Situation im gesprochenen Tschechisch zu skizzieren und somit einen Beitrag zur oben geschilderten Diskussion um das Verhältnis ST vs. GT zu leisten. Die zweite Ebene dieser Studie komplementiert die Auswertung des sprachlichen Materials. Mit per Fragebögen erhobenen soziologischen Daten und Angaben derselben Sprecher werden im Bereich des ST: 1) Kenntnisse (Kognition); 2) Grad der positiven Evaluation; 3) vor allem aber die Bereitschaft (Konation) der Sprecher zur Verwendung des ST untersucht. Die Einstellung der Tschechen zu ihrer Standardsprache, sekundär zu ihrer Koine, steht hier im Vordergrund. Diese Publikation leistet einen wichtigen Beitrag zu der seit der politischen Wende in Tschechien intensiviert geführten Diskussion um das Standardtschechische und Gemeintschechische (böhmische Koiné). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |