| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910468058803321 |
|
|
Autore |
Issitt Micah L. |
|
|
Titolo |
National security vs. civil & privacy rights / / Micah L. Issitt |
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Amenia, NY : , : Grey House Publishing, , [2018] |
|
�2018 |
|
Boston, Massachusetts : , : Credo Reference, , 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-78684-952-6 |
1-68217-721-1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[[First edition].] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (727 pages) : illustrations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Opinions throughout history |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Privacy, Right of - United States - Public opinion - History |
National security - United States - Public opinion - History |
Civil rights - United States - Public opinion - History |
Public opinion - United States - History |
Privacy, Right of - History |
Electronic books. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references (pages 669-681). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Publisher's note -- Editor's introduction -- Historical timeline -- The right to privacy: foundations of a constitutional debate (1890) -- Defining search and seizure: the Olmstead case and the legality of wiretapping (1928) -- Retro wireless surveillance: Federal Communications Act of 1934 and Goldman v. United States (1942) -- Privacy and the Red Menace: Barenblatt v. United States (1959) -- The constitutional right to privacy: Griswold v. Connecticut (1965) and Katz v. United States (1967) -- Information rights: New York Times Co. v. United States (1971) -- The origins of data security: privacy and security in computer systems (1967 and 1975) -- Monitoring dissidents: the FISA Act of 1978 -- Modernizing privacy philosophy: "privacy and the limits of law" (1980) -- Adjusting to technology: the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (1986) -- Calm before the storm: legal standards for the intelligence community in conducting electronic surveillance (2000) -- Privacy surrenders to patriotism: the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PATRIOT Act (2001) -- The Orwellian Age: Big Brother and the privacy debate -- Dividing the republic: punditry and journalism -- Trying security: the 2005 PATRIOT Act hearings -- The President's surveillance program: the 2005 domestic surveillance controversy -- Eyes everywhere: the National Applications Office controversy (2007) -- Debating privacy rights: the scholarly debate over the state of privacy -- |
Reassuring consumers: the European cloud computing controversy -- National insecurity: the Snowden leaks (2013) -- The right to hide: national security vs. the free market -- Brute force: the encryption debate -- The advocates: privacy advocates -- The case for bulk data: PATRIOT Act renewal (2015) -- The Snowden effect: the USA Freedom Act (2015) -- The writ to refuse: the Apple, Inc. iPhone controversy (2016) -- The debate continues: Section 702 renewal (2016-2018) -- The existence of privacy: the philosophy of privacy -- Permanent imbalance: public opinion in the right to privacy debate -- Primary & secondary sources -- Glossary -- Historical snapshots -- Bibliography. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
This new series from Grey House offers indepth, single volumes that follow the debate, or path, to a decision on a controversial topic as it evolved throughout history. Each volume offers a wide range of opinion essays and editorials, speeches, and journal articles and expert analysis. This volume offers a sweeping overview of the shifting tensions and public opinions fueled by Americans' expectations of privacy vs. their collective desire for national security. ... Diving into how far the government has gone and "should" go in the name of national security, this volume analyzes primary and secondary source documents such as Supreme Court decisions, articles from respected periodicals, and legislation. Coverage includes domestic spying, Apple's refusal to help with "back door" access of the iPhone, and the differences between President Obama's and President Trump's surveillance states. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |