|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910466924203321 |
|
|
Autore |
Ramakrishna Kumar |
|
|
Titolo |
Original sin? : revising the revisionist critique of the 1963 Operation Coldstore in Singapore / / Kumar Ramakrishna |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Singapore : , : Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, , 2015 |
|
©2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (vi, 167 pages) : digital, PDF file(s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Detention of persons - Singapore |
Political prisoners - Singapore |
Electronic books. |
Singapore Politics and government 1945-1963 |
Singapore History 1963-1965 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Frontmatter -- CONTENTS -- ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS -- INTRODUCTION. The "Alternate" Challenge to the Singapore Story as Context -- 1. Government Sources: Who Uses Them, and the Alternates' Unarticulated Ideological Outlook -- 2. Was there Really a Dangerous Communist United Front? -- 3. The Curious Case of Lim Chin Siong -- 4. Why "Was Operation Coldstore Driven by Political and Not Security Grounds?" is the Wrong Question -- Conclusion: The Enduring Need for a Singapore Story 2.0 -- BIBLIOGRAPHY -- INDEX -- ABOUT THE AUTHOR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
"Revisionist" or "alternative" historians have increasingly questioned elements of the Singapore Story - the master narrative of the nation's political and socioeconomic development since its founding by the British in 1819. Much criticism focuses especially on one defining episode of the Story: the internal security dragnet mounted on 2 February 1963 against Communist United Front elements on the island, known to posterity as Operation Coldstore. The revisionists claim that Coldstore was mounted for political rather than security reasons and actually destroyed a legitimate Progressive Left opposition - |
|
|
|
|