Judicial reconstruction and the rule of law [[electronic resource] ] : reassessing military intervention in Iraq and beyond / / by Angeline Lewis

• Record Nr.: UNINA9910465470803321
• Autore: Lewis Angeline
• Pubbl/distr/stampa: Leiden ; ; Boston, : M. Nijhoff Publishers, 2012
• ISBN: 1-283-59714-4; 9786613909596; 90-04-22811-X
• Descrizione fisica: 1 online resource (266 p.)
• Collana: International Humanitarian Law Series ; ; 39
• Disciplina: 340/.11
• Soggetti: Rule of law; Intervention (International law); Justice, Administration of; Law reform; Humanitarian law; Security, International; Security sector; Electronic books.
• Lingua di pubblicazione: Inglese
• Formato: Materiale a stampa
• Livello bibliografico: Monografia
• Note generali: Description based upon print version of record.
• Nota di bibliografia: Includes bibliographical references and index.
• Nota di contenuto: Preliminary Material -- Introduction -- The Rule of Law in International Law – A Reassessment -- The General Legislative Competence of an Occupant as to the Domestic Rule of Law -- The Administration of Judicial Institutions under the Law of Occupation -- Security Council Interventions outside an Explicit Occupation Framework -- Moving toward Rule of Law Legitimacy by Refocussing on Order in Intervention -- Bibliography -- Index of International Instruments -- Index of Cases -- Index.
• Sommario/riassunto: The idea of building a blueprint ‘rule of law’ through military intervention has seized the imagination of practitioners and theorists alike in the past decade of peacebuilding operations, and an emphasis on simultaneous judicial reconstruction and security sector reform has ; emerged as their central strategy. This work, in a fresh approach based on recent military operations in Iraq and beyond, challenges both the universality of the blueprint and the doctrinal assumption that institutional reform by military interveners builds peace and legitimacy. In a comprehensive review, the essential role of the community in developing its own relationship with law, while interveners refocus exclusively on restoring public security using their extraordinary powers under international humanitarian law, emerges as the only future for ‘rule of law operations.’