| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910465228203321 |
|
|
Autore |
Nussbaum Martha Craven <1947-> |
|
|
Titolo |
Anger and forgiveness : resentment, generosity, justice / / Martha C. Nussbaum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Oxford, England : , : Oxford University Press, , 2016 |
|
©2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
0-19-933589-3 |
0-19-933588-5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (322 pages) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Anger |
Forgiveness |
Electronic books. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
1. Introduction: furies into Eumenides -- 2. Anger: weakness, payback, down-ranking -- 3. Forgiveness: a genealogy -- 4. Intimate relationships: the trap of anger -- 5. The middle realm stoicism qualified -- 6. The political realm everyday justice -- 7. The political realm -- revolutionary justice -- 8. Conclusion: the eyes of the world -- Appendix A: emotions and upheavals of thought -- Appendix B: anger and blame; Appendix C: anger and Its species |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
In this wide-ranging book, Martha C. Nussbaum, one of our leading public intellectuals, argues that anger is conceptually confused and normatively pernicious. It assumes that the suffering of the wrongdoer restores the thing that was damaged, and it betrays an all-too-lively interest in relative status and humiliation. Studying anger in intimate relationships, casual daily interactions, the workplace, the criminal justice system, and movements for social transformation, Nussbaum shows that anger's core ideas are both infantile and harmful. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910794991503321 |
|
|
Autore |
Hahmann Andree |
|
|
Titolo |
Aristoteles gegen Epikur : Eine Untersuchung über die Prinzipien der hellenistischen Philosophie ausgehend vom Phänomen der Bewegung / / Andree Hahmann |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Berlin, [Germany] ; ; Boston, [Massachusetts] : , : De Gruyter, , 2017 |
|
©2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
3-11-049808-1 |
3-11-049920-7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (472 pages) : illustrations, tables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Untersuchungen zur antiken Literatur und Geschichte, , 1862-1112 ; ; Band 125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Philosophy, Ancient |
Philosophy - History |
Epicureans (Greek philosophy) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Frontmatter -- Vorwort -- Inhalt -- Einleitung -- Kapitel I – Form und Materie in der Wahrnehmung -- Kapitel II – Die Atome, das Leere und die atomaren Bilder -- Kapitel III – Naturabsicht und Selbsterhaltung -- Kapitel IV – Das Feuer der Wahrnehmung -- Kapitel V – Vorsehung, Zufall und Theodizee -- Ergebnis -- Anhang: Ist Kant der bessere Stoiker? -- Verzeichnis der verwendeten Siglen -- Glossar -- Literaturverzeichnis -- Sachregister -- Personenregister |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
Die Zurückweisung, mit der viele frühneuzeitliche Autoren der aristotelischen Naturphilosophie begegnen, geht häufig mit einer emphatischen Aufnahme der hellenistischen Philosophie einher. Vor diesem Hintergrund fragt die vorliegende Untersuchung nach den prinzipiellen Unterschieden zwischen Aristoteles und seinen hellenistischen Nachfolgern. Ausgangspunkt ist die für die aristotelische Philosophie zentrale Analyse des Phänomens der Bewegung. |
It is well known that Early Modern philosophers rejected Aristotelian philosophy of nature. At the same time, they passionately embraced the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
major Hellenistic schools of philosophy. The study takes this fact as a point of departure to explain the fundamental differences between Aristotle and his Hellenistic successors. At the heart of the investigation lies Aristotle’s discussion of motion, which is essential for many Aristotelian conceptions. |
|
|
|
|
|
| |