|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910464265903321 |
|
|
Autore |
Cory Therese Scarpelli <1982-> |
|
|
Titolo |
Aquinas on human self-knowledge / / Therese Scarpelli Cory [[electronic resource]] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Cambridge : , : Cambridge University Press, , 2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-107-50294-2 |
1-139-89360-2 |
1-107-50135-0 |
1-107-50671-9 |
1-107-51710-9 |
1-107-33761-5 |
1-107-49739-6 |
1-107-50402-3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (xi, 241 pages) : digital, PDF file(s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Self-knowledge, Theory of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
; Machine generated contents note: ; pt. I HISTORICAL AND TEXTUAL ORIGINS -- ; 1. The development of a medieval debate -- ; 2. The trajectory of Aquinas's theory of self-knowledge, 1252 -- 72 -- ; pt. II PHENOMENA AND PROBLEMS -- ; 3. Perceiving myself: the content of actual self-awareness -- ; 4. Perceiving myself: is self-awareness an intuitive act? -- ; 5. The significance of self-presence: habitual self-awareness -- ; 6. Implicit vs. explicit self-awareness and the duality of conscious thought -- ; 7. Discovering the soul's nature: quidditative self-knowledge -- ; 8. Self-knowledge and psychological personhood. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
Self-knowledge is commonly thought to have become a topic of serious philosophical inquiry during the early modern period. Already in the thirteenth century, however, the medieval thinker Thomas Aquinas developed a sophisticated theory of self-knowledge, which Therese Scarpelli Cory presents as a project of reconciling the conflicting phenomena of self-opacity and privileged self-access. Situating Aquinas's theory within the mid-thirteenth-century debate and his own |
|
|
|
|