1.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910464075303321

Autore

DelCogliano Mark

Titolo

Basil of Caesarea's anti-Eunomian theory of names [[electronic resource] ] : Christian theology and late-antique philosophy in the fourth century trinitarian controversy / / by Mark DelCogliano

Pubbl/distr/stampa

Leiden ; ; Boston, : Brill, 2010

ISBN

1-283-03912-5

9786613039125

90-04-18910-6

90-04-18332-9

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource (316 p.)

Collana

Supplements to Vigiliae Christianae : texts and studies of early Christian life and language ; ; v. 103

Disciplina

273/.4

Soggetti

Eunomianism

Trinity - History of doctrines - Early church, ca. 30-600

God (Christianity) - Name - History of doctrines - Early church, ca. 30-600

Theology - Methodology - History - To 1500

Electronic books.

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Note generali

Revised version of the author's thesis (Ph.D.)--Emory University, 2009.

Nota di bibliografia

Includes bibliographical references (p. [267]-284) and indexes.

Nota di contenuto

Preliminary Material / M. Delcogliano -- Introduction / M. Delcogliano -- Chapter One. The Heteroousians On Names And Naming / M. Delcogliano -- Chapter Two. The Heteroousians And Philosophical Theories Of Names / M. Delcogliano -- Chapter Three. The Heteroousian Theory Of Names In Its Christian Context / M. Delcogliano -- Chapter Four. Basil’s Critiques Of Eunomius’s Theory Of Names / M. Delcogliano -- Chapter Five. Basil’s Notionalist Theory Of Names / M. Delcogliano -- Chapter Six. Basil On Names As Revelatory Of Properties / M. Delcogliano -- General Conclusion / M. Delcogliano -- Bibliography / M. Delcogliano -- Index Locorum / M. Delcogliano -- Index Of Scripture / M. Delcogliano -- General Index / M. Delcogliano.

Sommario/riassunto

Basil of Caesarea’s debate with Eunomius of Cyzicus in the early 360s marks a turning point in the fourth-century Trinitarian controversies. It



shifted focus to methodological and epistemological disputes underlying theological differences. This monograph explores one of these fundamental points of contention: the proper theory of names. It offers a revisionist interpretation of Eunomius’s theory as a corrective to previous approaches, contesting the widespread assumption that it is indebted to Platonist sources and showing that it was developed by drawing upon proximate Christian sources. While Eunomius held that names uniquely predicated of God communicated the divine essence, in response Basil developed a “notionalist” theory wherein all names signify primarily notions and secondarily properties, not essence.